Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Need\s+help\s+with\s+header\s+decision\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Need\s+help\s+with\s+header\s+decision\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Need help with header decision. (score: 1): Author: <wsamouce@kc.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 16:47:25 +0000; Closing in on header purchase time. Would like the boardb s opinions on C.A.T. headers vs S.S. headers. I believe that the S.S. headers are a smaller diameter? This would help in low end torque but t; /html/tigers/2011-02/msg00113.html (7,074 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Need help with header decision. (score: 1): Author: "Buck Trippel" <BuckTrippel@Verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:58:55 -0800; Hi Duke, I have 3 Tigers, each with a different header/exhaust manifold. I run the CAT headers on our race Tiger with a 289 that probably produces power in the range your stoker will. I have had no c; /html/tigers/2011-02/msg00122.html (9,747 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Need help with header decision. (score: 1): Author: Tom Parker <tkparker1941@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:45:19 -0500; I can't speak to performance. I installed Rick's headers (SS) with no problems. The fit's tight but I didn't have to modify anything. Tom ' 67 Mark 2 _______________________________________________; /html/tigers/2011-02/msg00128.html (8,047 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]