Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+Which\s+radiator\s+is\s+better\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+Which\s+radiator\s+is\s+better\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TR] Which radiator is better (score: 1): Author: "Jeremiah Curry" <jercurry@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 22:10:55 -0600; Howdy all, I am going to boil out the radiator for my 57 Triumph TR3. I have two and am wondering if you guys can give me any guidance as to which one is better. The one that was in the car (removing; /html/triumphs/2006-05/msg00569.html (7,302 bytes)
2. Re: [TR] Which radiator is better (score: 1): Author: John Wise <60TR3A@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 06:16:06 -0700; For about $200 I had my old one re-cored with a modern core (more fins & tubes) sans the crank hole & even here in the Phoenix summer it never gets above 185F. I highly recommend that approach... --; /html/triumphs/2006-05/msg00572.html (7,759 bytes)
3. RE: [TR] Which radiator is better (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 08:16:59 -0700; I did too, but only after the radiator shop tested my original radiator for efficiency and said that, even though it didn't leak, it didn't cool properly. Something about the fins not being in good t; /html/triumphs/2006-05/msg00577.html (7,678 bytes)
4. Re: [TR] Which radiator is better (score: 1): Author: "THOMAS FANSHER" <tfansher@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 11:21:49 -0400; I couldn't agree with John more. The new core made the most difference in the cooling of my TR3. (Do it right the first time and not have to do it again because it's not that easy to redo if it overh; /html/triumphs/2006-05/msg00579.html (6,984 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]