Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+TR4\s+\&\s+TR6\s+question\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TR] TR4 & TR6 question (score: 1)
Author: marty sukey <trmarty@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 20:41:05 -0500
Now we are getting somewhere. You will probably find that this is a good thing for you. I am told that the differences between the TR4A and TR6 frames are relatively minor. Now I'm out of here, becau
/html/triumphs/2008-12/msg00308.html (7,912 bytes)

2. Re: [TR] TR4 & TR6 question (score: 1)
Author: John Mitchell <jmitch@snet.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:17:31 -0500
I disagree. Springs such as those found in clutch covers sometimes "take a set" when stored under tension. Pivot points inside the cover were originally lubricated, but the lube has dried up by now.
/html/triumphs/2008-12/msg00309.html (8,045 bytes)

3. Re: [TR] TR4 & TR6 question (score: 1)
Author: marty sukey <trmarty@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:23:39 -0500
I think the main point here is that not all NOS parts are good, nor are they all bad. One must consider the type of material, availability, condition, price, etc. Parts stored 10 years will likely be
/html/triumphs/2008-12/msg00310.html (8,933 bytes)

4. Re: [TR] TR4 & TR6 question (score: 1)
Author: William McLeod <wbmcleod@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:26:19 -0700
And 40-50 years of storage is not going to improve the parts any. In some cases, there is a good reason the part was left on the shelf. I've seen more than one that on close examination showed the sc
/html/triumphs/2008-12/msg00311.html (7,000 bytes)

5. Re: [TR] TR4 & TR6 question (score: 1)
Author: pethier@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 04:26:06 +0000
Exactly my point. The "NOS" appellation is no guarantee of part quality, good or bad. Randall _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.html This li
/html/triumphs/2008-12/msg00312.html (8,725 bytes)

6. Re: [TR] TR4 & TR6 question (score: 1)
Author: "levilevi" <levilevi@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:29:06 -0700
Being a 'partsman' in a past life, I'd like to add a point here on identities. Stanpart branded stuff really is old but for the UK at least and certainly while Triumphs were still being made, the who
/html/triumphs/2008-12/msg00313.html (10,149 bytes)

7. Re: [TR] TR4 & TR6 question (score: 1)
Author: "Ken Gano palm top" <triumphs@consolidated.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:31:59 -0600
Indeed, some parts are still available new with the UniPart brand name. http://tinyurl.com/4rxn27 Randall _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/donate.
/html/triumphs/2008-12/msg00315.html (7,470 bytes)

8. Re: [TR] TR4 & TR6 question (score: 1)
Author: "Dave Connitt" <dconnitt@fuse.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 21:45:42 -0500
That was going to be my point, but I see Nolan has beat me to it. Too much heat will quickly destroy the cutting edge; it only takes a few drops of good cutting oil to keep it cool. IMO securing the
/html/triumphs/2008-12/msg00334.html (8,183 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu