Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+Hot\/stumbling\s+GT6\+\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+Hot\/stumbling\s+GT6\+\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TR] Hot/stumbling GT6+ (score: 1): Author: TR250Driver@aol.com; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 12:09:30 EDT; Hey Guys, I have very few hours before heading to VTR in Texas. Good News is the GT6+ Rumbles no more. It looks as if a bad driveshaft was the problem, not to mention the vertical links installed on; /html/triumphs/2006-07/msg00409.html (7,623 bytes)
2. RE: [TR] Hot/stumbling GT6+ (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:36:06 -0700; Darrell, According to my GT6+ manual, the timing should be either 4 ATDC or 6 BTDC, depending on whether the vacuum retard module is present, connected and working, or not. My advice would be to dis; /html/triumphs/2006-07/msg00414.html (8,191 bytes)
3. Re: [TR] Hot/stumbling GT6+ (score: 1): Author: TR250Driver@aol.com; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 19:36:34 EDT; This GT6 is all modified so there is no vacuum advance or retard present. I could not believe it either but I am going to say the timing was at 22 degrees advanced at idle. Fast idle though, maybe 9; /html/triumphs/2006-07/msg00421.html (7,783 bytes)
4. RE: [TR] Hot/stumbling GT6+ (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:15:18 -0700; That still has me thinking there is a problem with the mechanical advance or with the timing marks. Especially with a modified motor, normally one modifies for as much compression as possible (since; /html/triumphs/2006-07/msg00422.html (8,052 bytes)
5. Re: [TR] Hot/stumbling GT6+ (score: 1): Author: TR250Driver@aol.com; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:20:52 EDT; It appears as if the distributor is advancing the timing normally when the motor is reved up. Would that be an indication that all is well with the weights? Thanks for your Help, Darrell == This lis; /html/triumphs/2006-07/msg00423.html (6,862 bytes)
6. RE: [TR] Hot/stumbling GT6+ (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 20:06:39 -0700; Yeah, that seems reasonable. In an ideal world, you would compare the advance to the curve given somewhere ... but if you can see the timing mark move smoothly as you slowly rev the engine up, and s; /html/triumphs/2006-07/msg00430.html (7,892 bytes)
7. RE: [TR] Hot/stumbling GT6+ (score: 1): Author: oliver <sumton@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:18:52 -0700 (PDT); is not 105 here. temp index (feels like) is 105; temp is "only" about 100 ;-) == This list supported in part by The Vintage Triumph Register == http://www.vtr.org; /html/triumphs/2006-07/msg00433.html (7,181 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]