Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+Flywheels\s+Stock\s+vs\.\s+Steel\s+vs\.\s+Alloy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TR\]\s+Flywheels\s+Stock\s+vs\.\s+Steel\s+vs\.\s+Alloy\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TR] Flywheels Stock vs. Steel vs. Alloy (score: 1): Author: N197TR4@cs.com; Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:01:47 EDT; "I'm not interested in buying but I'm curious. If there "are no downsides", why is the friend changing to a new steel flywheel? Or is the new steel wheel supposed to be even better, or something? - -; /html/triumphs/2006-08/msg00660.html (8,531 bytes)
2. RE: [TR] Flywheels Stock vs. Steel vs. Alloy (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:24:42 -0700; Which points out what may be a downside to some people ... running a lightweight flywheel does make the engine a lot rougher under power at very low rpm, making the car at least somewhat harder to l; /html/triumphs/2006-08/msg00664.html (7,753 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]