Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+Winding\s+clocks\s+with\s+pull\s+chains\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Shop\-talk\]\s+Winding\s+clocks\s+with\s+pull\s+chains\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Shop-talk] Winding clocks with pull chains (score: 1): Author: Brian C Kennedy <kennedybc@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:33:55 -0500; Some time ago, someone suggested lifting the weight when you pull the chain. Our clock repairman was by today and he said don9t do it. The clocks are designed to handle the load and he9s seen many ca; /html/shop-talk/2010-02/msg00199.html (7,315 bytes)
2. Re: [Shop-talk] Winding clocks with pull chains (score: 1): Author: Steven Trovato <strovato@optonline.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:34:16 -0500; Yes, I am the guilty party. I would defer to the expert. It just seemed like it made sense at the time. I did a quick search and I found "experts" who are in both camps. One site, www.cuckookingdom.c; /html/shop-talk/2010-02/msg00200.html (9,099 bytes)
3. Re: [Shop-talk] Winding clocks with pull chains (score: 1): Author: John Innis <jdinnis@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:46:52 -0600; On the moving of the hands, I know it varies by the design of the movement. For example the instruistions that came with out Seth Thomas (circa 1911) state that the hands are ONLY to be moved counter; /html/shop-talk/2010-02/msg00201.html (10,097 bytes)
4. Re: [Shop-talk] Winding clocks with pull chains (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:22:50 -0800; Really? Dad had some old Seth Thomas clocks (not sure of the exact vintage, but pre-WWI) and they would jam if you turned the hands backwards. It also got the chime counter out of sync if you went f; /html/shop-talk/2010-02/msg00202.html (8,471 bytes)
5. Re: [Shop-talk] Winding clocks with pull chains (score: 1): Author: "shochschild@att.net" <shochschild@att.net>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:40:06 -0600; It's not that the weight is heavier, it is that the gearing is taller by 8x as compared to the daily winder... _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http://www.team.net/don; /html/shop-talk/2010-02/msg00203.html (7,958 bytes)
6. Re: [Shop-talk] Winding clocks with pull chains (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@ca.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:46:43 -0800; So why would that have anything to do with winding? I assume the one-way clutch is before any gearing ... On the wife's clocks it's built right into the sprocket. -- Randall ________________________; /html/shop-talk/2010-02/msg00204.html (7,355 bytes)
7. Re: [Shop-talk] Winding clocks with pull chains (score: 1): Author: "Ron Schmittou" <rs1121@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:15:59 -0600; Or you can just do what my dad does - He made the chain into a long loop then just moves the weight up the chain every few days _______________________________________________ Support Team.Net http:/; /html/shop-talk/2010-02/msg00205.html (7,295 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]