- 1. [Shop-talk] Team.Net status (score: 1)
- Author: Mark J Bradakis <mark@bradakis.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 00:47:12 -0600 (MDT)
- Yes, there have been problems with the Team.Net mailing lists, related web pages, FTP stuff and such. And it ain't over yet. It should all be fine by next week, though. The current ISP providing Team
- /html/shop-talk/2009-05/msg00012.html (8,663 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Shop-talk] Team.Net status (score: 1)
- Author: scott.hall@comcast.net
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:40:23 +0000 (UTC)
- heyzeus marimba. mark, that's a ton of crap to put up with so I can ask people how to run an air line in my garage. I am moved to help defray some of the monetary costs--if not the psychic ones--of r
- /html/shop-talk/2009-05/msg00013.html (8,255 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Shop-talk] Team.Net status (score: 1)
- Author: Pat Horne <pat@hornesystemstx.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 10:46:21 -0500
- There is a link at the bottom of Mar's emails for donations, as well as at the bottom of each email we receive from the list. Peace, Pat Thusly spake scott.hall@comcast.net, On 5/6/2009 10:40 AM: --
- /html/shop-talk/2009-05/msg00014.html (9,652 bytes)
- 4. Re: [Shop-talk] Team.Net status (score: 1)
- Author: scott.hall@comcast.net
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:31:34 +0000 (UTC)
- well look at that...I delete all that out of habit from the days when if you didn't, the message wouldn't get posted. I don't think I've ever really looked at the .sig stuff. 'course now we're chewin
- /html/shop-talk/2009-05/msg00015.html (7,148 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Shop-talk] Team.Net status (score: 1)
- Author: Wayne <wmc_st@xxiii.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 16:45:48 -0400
- What incredible jackassery! Please post their names, so we can be sure not to inadvertently do anything nice for them, should we meet at the track or tool store! Most my spam reporting falls on deaf
- /html/shop-talk/2009-05/msg00016.html (7,312 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu