Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Temp\s+guage\s+accuracy\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Healeys\]\s+Temp\s+guage\s+accuracy\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Healeys] Temp guage accuracy (score: 1): Author: "Mirek Sharp" <m.g.sharp@sympatico.ca>; Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:59:29 -0400; In a recent post, Dave Porter wrote: "The old temp gauges are horribly I am not sure what Dave means by "old" (just 4 bangers or all Healeys?), and I only have experience with one, but when I had my; /html/healeys/2009-04/msg00765.html (7,372 bytes)
2. Re: [Healeys] Temp guage accuracy (score: 1): Author: "Dan Stromquist" <dan@warner-associates.com>; Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:06:43 -0500; I boiled water and tested mine just as I took it off the stove and it showed 212 F. right on the button. Dan In a recent post, Dave Porter wrote: "The old temp gauges are horribly inaccurate". I am n; /html/healeys/2009-04/msg00797.html (8,227 bytes)
3. Re: [Healeys] Temp guage accuracy (score: 1): Author: Oudesluys <coudesluijs@chello.nl>; Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:00:17 +0200; Though fragile, the SMITHS/Jaeger UK ether bulb mechanical temp. gauges are pretty accurate, much more than the later bimetallic or spool ones. Kees Oudesluijs Mirek Sharp schreef: __________________; /html/healeys/2009-04/msg00829.html (8,000 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]