Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+TR6\s+mufflers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[6pack\]\s+TR6\s+mufflers\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [6pack] TR6 mufflers (score: 1): Author: samuelsma@aol.com; Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:12:53 -0500; At what RPM range does the restriction of the stock muffler become noticeable?? Also, do you have any personal experience actually hearing any of the 3 recommended mufflers?? I?would like to avoid t; /html/6pack/2008-01/msg00036.html (7,950 bytes)
2. Re: [6pack] TR6 mufflers (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 08:30:28 -0800; The stock muffler is SO bad in terms flow that a guess would be that anything over 3,000 is severely degraded in terms of power. You will not notice any difference at low RPMs as the engine is not p; /html/6pack/2008-01/msg00037.html (9,752 bytes)
3. Re: [6pack] TR6 mufflers (score: 1): Author: forzion@maine.rr.com; Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 13:12:00 -0500; I've installed the RR1400SS all stainless system from Rimmer Bros. http://www.rimmerbros.co.uk/rimmer/triumph/tr6/exhaust#Exhaust%20System% 20(Sports) They refer to it as 'System D' on that webpage.; /html/6pack/2008-01/msg00041.html (10,892 bytes)
4. Re: [6pack] TR6 mufflers (score: 1): Author: Jim Jones <jimjcmo@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:19:31 -0800 (PST); I have this same system and can vouch for it, too. It is a lot more expensive than what Vance describes, however. But if you want get maximum breathing and flow from a modified motor it may be prefer; /html/6pack/2008-01/msg00042.html (11,351 bytes)
5. Re: [6pack] TR6 mufflers (score: 1): Author: Robert Lang <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 14:39:26 -0500 (EST); I'm not Vance and I don't play him on TV... BUT: I have a turbo style muffler on my race car. I run autocross and we have strict sound regs in our region (93 dba at 75 feet). I have driven past the s; /html/6pack/2008-01/msg00043.html (8,777 bytes)
6. Re: [6pack] TR6 mufflers (score: 1): Author: "Robert N. Clark" <rclark@robertsonclark.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:59:06 -0800; What is the current thinking on glass packs. When I was a little more than half my current age and a college student, I put this giant glass pack on my '71. I recall that it had a 2 inch diameter inl; /html/6pack/2008-01/msg00044.html (9,665 bytes)
7. Re: [6pack] TR6 mufflers (score: 1): Author: Robert Lang <lang@isis.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:52:11 -0500 (EST); Most of the glasspacks that I've looked at have a couple things working against them. First - the dimples usually extend into the gas path. That means restriction. Second, most of them "neck down" i; /html/6pack/2008-01/msg00045.html (8,572 bytes)
8. Re: [6pack] TR6 mufflers (score: 1): Author: "Navarrette, Vance" <vance.navarrette@intel.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:14:19 -0800; I used glass packs in high school. My big objection to them was that the fiberglass packing eventually loads up with carbon, and then they get LOUD. As David Vizard also mentions, many of them flow; /html/6pack/2008-01/msg00046.html (8,889 bytes)
9. Re: [6pack] TR6 mufflers (score: 1): Author: "Robert N. Clark" <rclark@robertsonclark.com>; Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 13:37:29 -0800; Vance & Bob, Thanks for the input on that subject. I'll file it away for when the time comes to replace my system. Bob Clark '69 TR6 Most of the glasspacks that I've looked at have a couple things wo; /html/6pack/2008-01/msg00047.html (8,556 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]