Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jhadler@rmi.net: 280 ]

Total 280 documents matching your query.

161. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 12:08:36 -0700
You know that I'm not advocating that. I'm just throwing that out as an example of alternate wording. I personally feel that once you allow a car (or owner) certain mods etc.. You should not then com
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00965.html (11,923 bytes)

162. Re: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:11:22 -0700
Then you find yourself on-course, and behind the wheel. And all of a sudden, all those hassles seem to melt away for 60 seconds or so... :-) -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Raci
/html/autox/1999-06/msg00981.html (8,970 bytes)

163. Re: ST @ Nationals (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 18:16:58 -0700
That's not a fair challenge! You probably couldn't get tires to chunk at Oakland if you tried. Sealed asphalt is not exactly the most grippy or abrasive surface, far from it. Unless of course, Oaklan
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01026.html (9,154 bytes)

164. Re: Turbo Update/Backdate - A Solution (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 16:44:01 -0700
[snip] This attitude of "getting shafted by Denver" is starting to stink a little too... Yes, I personally think that the update/backdate rule as was -interpreted- made for interesting development. A
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01332.html (10,951 bytes)

165. Re: Good choices for ST (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 17:07:56 -0700
No, the E36 M3 is out because of displacement. But also from the TYPE of limited slip. Viscous LSD's that were factory equipped are legal. Torsen and Clutch pack LSD's however are not legal for ST. S
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01333.html (9,266 bytes)

166. Re: PROPOSAL: Super Street Touring Class (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:19:40 -0700
I agree, if someone is going to go to all the trouble of bolting a turbo charged VTEC motor into their Civic, why would the stop at head porting? Seems silly to me. Well, in the light of the thread,
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01649.html (10,940 bytes)

167. Re: PROPOSAL: Super Street Touring Class (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:34:54 -0700
Is that really the factor there? I somehow doubt it, that's overly simplistic and I don't think it works. SO a 2L motor at 1bar is still 2L? No way. That's still -way- more manifold pressure than a n
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01653.html (10,023 bytes)

168. Re: PROPOSAL: Super Street Touring Class (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 14:58:55 -0700
[snip] This is the crux of the matter as I see it. And unfortunately, is the downfall too. "If you build it, they will come" is what everyone seems to see here. Ok, say we make this class and we begi
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01655.html (11,056 bytes)

169. Re: PROPOSAL: Super Street Touring Class (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 17:22:53 -0700
Or even a change or addition to an existing rule structure. But we've been through enough of that for now... The problem I see here is that while the ST seems to cater to the IHRA type cars, it does
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01671.html (11,554 bytes)

170. Re: ADDL PROPOSAL: Super Street Touring Class (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 18:50:04 -0600
Waitaminutehere.... Ain't you one of them thar Mod car drivers? Trying to sneak in and whoop up on us poor ol' door-slamers? Well I ain't gonna fall for it... :-) -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01680.html (8,250 bytes)

171. Re: PROPOSAL: Super Street Touring Class (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 23:44:39 -0600
That's just it. A -reasonable- path. I see Super Street Touring ultimately becoming a mega buck class. I don't beleive that's what we want. We shoudl be aiming at the enthusiast that's willing to inv
/html/autox/1999-06/msg01689.html (11,109 bytes)

172. Atwater results, please? (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 15:12:39 -0700
Does anyone have somewhat complete results from Atwater? Anyone? Bueller?... Bueller?.... Bueller?.... -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '87 Quantum Syncro -
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00087.html (6,496 bytes)

173. Re: More Route66 crap (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 23:43:18 -0600
First off, you're right about personal responsibility. If you have a concern regarding the safety of the event, -SAY SOMETHING-! Talk to the event chair, or better yet, the safety steward. That is wh
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00165.html (10,396 bytes)

174. The new Fiero, same dud or or super dude? (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Thu, 06 May 1999 22:12:34 -0600
Well, I honestly don't know. But I admit, I am interested. But I'm interested in any mid-engined sports car. Even if it's a <cough> Pontiac. ;-) I took a peek at a Fiero web site and the listed a lit
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00248.html (7,096 bytes)

175. Re: New Colorado National Tour date (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 11:13:05 -0700
Yes. The region lost the site for the SLC Tour. I shouldn't say it like that, I doubt that the region members had any responsibility for that. Sometimes site owners change their minds, and it sucks.
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00321.html (7,482 bytes)

176. Re: Torque Wrench thoughts (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 17:02:39 -0700
S/K, Husky, or a number of other brands. But -not- Sears if you're looking for a click-type torque wrench. The S/K, Husky and others are all basically the same wrench sold under different names, and
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00348.html (7,931 bytes)

177. Re: Large course design questions (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 10:10:16 -0700
Well, there have been a few decent answers so far, so I won't add much. However, the one factor that -must- be paid attention to is the course and how that effects safety. On some courses (not many t
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00533.html (10,726 bytes)

178. Re: Large course design questions (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 11:28:16 -0700
Yup, I meant to mention this. Never used a fixed time to stagger cars. The starter also has to be aware of the cars that are going out on course. Otherwise, you'll be finding a red-flag situation, an
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00536.html (8,577 bytes)

179. Re: Composite body panels in SP (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 09:13:32 -0700
Only if that body panel was available from -the factory- on that car. Otherwise alternate body panels are explicitly forbidden. And in your case, I'm quite sure Honda never offered a CF hood for a Ci
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00645.html (7,389 bytes)

180. Re: photography question (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 13:27:21 -0700
Yes that's true. What pushing really does however, is to make that "mis-setting" consistent throughout the entire roll of film. Making non-standard development/processing a single process instead of
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00657.html (8,316 bytes)

Current List: 161 - 180
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
This search system is powered by Namazu