Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Polariods\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Polariods\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Polariods (score: 1): Author: David Laver <David.Laver@msdw.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 10:19:06 +0100; I was wondering about the 'poor quality' comment. How does polaroid compare to conventional negative? Thinking in conventional terms the light is cast over a huge area so it is going to have to be a; /html/vintage-race/2000-08/msg00259.html (7,687 bytes)
2. Re: Polariods (score: 1): Author: Simon Favre <simon@mondes.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 11:43:16 -0700; Boy, did I open a can of worms on this one. ;=) This is now the vintage photographers digest! My comment stemmed from the fact that exposing and developing a large format polaroid almost invariably r; /html/vintage-race/2000-08/msg00262.html (10,384 bytes)
3. Re: Polariods (score: 1): Author: JXLmail@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 00:58:13 EDT; I've got a friend that interviewed Ansel Adams. The interview via phone was conducted toward the end of his career. He stated that prefered to use type 55 .. photo and Neg in one shot. I believe that; /html/vintage-race/2000-08/msg00266.html (6,537 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]