Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VTR\s+Site\s+Restricted\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*VTR\s+Site\s+Restricted\s*$/: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

1. VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: "Bob Danielson" <75trsix@snet.net>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 12:13:47 -0400; When/why did VTR.org decide to restrict the maintenance section to members only? Did the people who wrote these articles know that distribution was going to be restricted and not available to everyon; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00494.html (7,819 bytes)
2. Re: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: "Blake J. Discher" <bdischer@blakedischer.com>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 22:15:45 -0400; Hello listers, Earlier today I responded in detail to Bob Danielson's inquiry and copied the list, but the reply never made it to the list, perhaps due to its length. If you are interested in reading; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00515.html (8,074 bytes)
3. RE: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: "Scott Suhring" <suhringtr36@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 22:59:35 -0400; Thank you for sharing your explanation as to the new restrictions on the VTR site. I have two articles in the maintenance section and still get emails asking me questions. I have other articles that; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00516.html (9,795 bytes)
4. RE: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: "Steve TR6" <stevestr6@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 20:15:39 -0700; Hi BlakeI think you may be mistaken. The more triumphs that are operational, the broader potential for membership there is for VTR. Withholding the maintenance pages seems like cutting off your nose; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00517.html (8,432 bytes)
5. RE: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 21:43:04 -0700; So does that mean you're going to resign from the list ? Randall; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00518.html (8,006 bytes)
6. Re: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: Michael Porter <portermd@zianet.com>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 23:07:46 -0600; Have read the reasoning behind the decision. Sorry, but I don't agree. Bad idea, Blake. Doubt it will increase membership, and it might just put people off from joining. I notice on the front page th; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00519.html (11,143 bytes)
7. RE: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: "Blake J. Discher" <bdischer@blakedischer.com>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 01:11:18 -0400; Hi Randall... I'm not exactly sure what you are asking or implying. If you are asking if I personally plan to resign from the Auto-X list because of a VTR issue, I respectfully answer no. The decisio; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00520.html (8,988 bytes)
8. RE: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 22:42:07 -0700; Well, you said that people getting information for free was "unfair" and I assume you wouldn't want to be part of any unfairness ... on either side ... You certainly presented it as your idea ... I d; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00521.html (9,901 bytes)
9. RE: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: "Dave Connitt" <dconnitt@fuse.net>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 02:16:15 -0400; In the interest of resolving this issue for those who would rather not join VTR I will offer to post any maintenance articles sent to me by it's author on my website for free. There,,, now can we re; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00522.html (8,436 bytes)
10. Re: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: John & Patricia Donnelly <pdonnel1@san.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 23:48:21 -0700; After the Classified Advertisements pages, the Maintenance Handbook pages are the most visited pages on the site and arguably are the most valuable asset on the site. The articles were written by ded; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00523.html (10,513 bytes)
11. RE: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: "John Runge" <johnrunge1@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 07:40:01 -0400 (Eastern Standard Time); Hi Listeria Street, Has anyone tried to print from the maintenance book pages? I tried a couple of times and found that the pages "run on" and I lose data on the bottom of the page. Additionally, the; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00525.html (9,120 bytes)
12. Re: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: Steven Newell <steven@newellboys.com>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 07:01:28 -0600; Blake, first I wanted to pass along kudos on your effort to update the site. I've built commercial and community sites and appreciate the scale of your personal effort. A great contribution to the co; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00528.html (9,533 bytes)
13. Re: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: "Kurtis" <tr4driver@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 08:21:40 -0500; Blake, As a dues paying VTR member, I respect the board's decision regarding the restriction of the maintenance articles; however, I agree with others here who feel it's a bad decision. I strongly b; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00530.html (10,277 bytes)
14. Re: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@razzolink.com>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 06:58:18 -0700; There appears to have been an invitation issued to comment upon the new VTR policy of restricting technical information to just VTR club members (paid subscribers). I thought about the restriction of; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00532.html (10,260 bytes)
15. Re: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: TeriAnn Wakeman <twakeman@razzolink.com>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 09:06:28 -0700; Interesting. I've always considered email lists to be the next best thing to having an active local club and to be more of a club than any traditional national club can be. Lists, by definition are; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00538.html (9,411 bytes)
16. Re: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: George Richardson <gprtech@frontiernet.net>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 12:13:00 -0400; One of the Triumph Stag clubs has restricted access to such info. I don't like it and didn't join, for that an other reasons that I feel relate to it. I joined the VTR back before it had a site, rene; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00539.html (9,726 bytes)
17. Re: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: Chris Kantarjiev <cak@dimebank.com>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT); I, for one, am not very happy about this. I speak as the VTR's TR4A Vehicle Consultant and a long time contributor to the VTR website - I wrote the 4A buyer's guide, much of the GT6 buyer's guide, as; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00540.html (9,777 bytes)
18. RE: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: "Jim Bauder" <jimbpps@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 09:53:17 -0700; I agree, that is an excellent idea!! Jim Bauder '68 TR250, CD47L (At the body shop for painting!!) Scottsdale, AZ (a loooong time VTR Member!) Blake, first I wanted to pass along kudos on your effort; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00541.html (9,935 bytes)
19. RE: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 10:48:33 -0700; --Original Message-- From: owner-triumphs@autox.team.net [mailto:owner-triumphs@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of John & Patricia Donnelly Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 11:48 PM To: Blake J. Discher; Triumph; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00542.html (9,223 bytes)
20. Re: VTR Site Restricted (score: 1): Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com; Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 14:12:51 EDT; The VTR has always been elitist. The TR Guys look down on the Wedge guy, the Wedge guys look down on the Saloon guys and everybody looks down on us Spitfire guys. That will never change. Probably tru; /html/triumphs/2005-05/msg00544.html (10,393 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]