Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR6\s+bolt\s+on\s+supercharger\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*TR6\s+bolt\s+on\s+supercharger\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. re:TR6 bolt on supercharger (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 20:34:22 -0600charset="iso-8859-1"; I for one would definitely commit to purchasing such a bolt on kit. I would be willing to pay a little extra for Nick Formica's hard work, provided it wasn't too steep, say $1700-$2000. What would a; /html/triumphs/1998-12/msg00497.html (7,026 bytes)
2. Re: TR6 bolt on supercharger (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 21:04:58 -0700; I wonder about "the rest of the car remains stock." I haven't read the article, admittedly, so I don't know what amount of boost is being generated. However, if the supercharger is raising a stock 11; /html/triumphs/1998-12/msg00504.html (10,670 bytes)
3. Re: TR6 bolt on supercharger (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 06 Dec 1998 21:48:20 -0700; That makes a bit more sense, I suppose--the Model 62 flows a maximum of about 450 scfm, while the 45 about 330. A stock TR6 engine in good condition probably flows 190-200 cfm at 6000 rpm, so a 62 wo; /html/triumphs/1998-12/msg00507.html (7,413 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]