Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SU\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SU\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. SU (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 08:50:51 -0400; The engine that I replaced in the 1970 Spit MKIII had a single Stromberg carb. The 1969 engine that I put in had dual SU's. I had to put the Stromberg on the 1969 engine at the time but I was wonderi; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg00871.html (6,616 bytes)
2. Re: SU (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 14:42:20 +0000; I rebuilt my SU HS4's on my car, and had no major problems, one thing someone once told me is don't clean the carbon from your butterflys (he owned a 2.5PI with 6 of them). Apperntly he did this and; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg00875.html (8,253 bytes)
3. Re: SU (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 14:55:32 +0000 (GMT); There is a bloke that attends alot of the shows who reconditions SU's and sells them real cheap, if I remember correctly a Dutch friend bought a pair of HS4's for Ł100 quid(approx $150) at the Spi; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg00878.html (8,398 bytes)
4. Re: SU (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 10:19:47 EST; I'm a big fan of the SU and I've rebuilt two sets so far... I'll be starting on set #3 soon.... ..my best piece of advice is that first of all, LBC's are meant to have at least two carbs under the b; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg00880.html (7,595 bytes)
5. Re: SU (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 08:29:19 -0800; By all means, rebuild the SU's and re-fit them. You will be amazed by the difference in performance. Also, you might think that tuning dual SU's will be more difficult than a single Stromberg, but m; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg00884.html (7,543 bytes)
6. SU (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 15:36:01 -0800; Mark, put the su's on!! What a difference 1 1/4 su's were on my Spit 1500! I had a single stromberg on it and when I changed over to the su's I couldn't believe how much better the engine breathed-in; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg00906.html (7,005 bytes)
7. Re: SU (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 18:48:12 -0500; I have SU's on my 1969 Spit, and I would not have anything else. They are very easy to work on, and rebuild. Once properly set up, the car will run much better, too. Of course, this is my own opinion; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg00920.html (7,391 bytes)
8. Re: SU (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 23:43:09 -0600; General consenus is that the SU's use less gas, are easier to tune, and you get more power. And they are not hard to rebuild, I did my first rebuild on HS2"s this year and had never attempted to rebu; /html/triumphs/1997-12/msg00930.html (7,545 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]