- 1. Opinions? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 12:45:48 -0400
- I will be purchasing a GT6 very soon to replace my (sniff) old Mk. 1. In the collective HO's of the list, which of the years have the best parts availability, hot rod potential, handling, etc? My ol
- /html/triumphs/1997-07/msg00731.html (7,309 bytes)
- 2. Re: Opinions? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 12:10:40 -0700
- the collective HO's of the list, which of the years have the best parts availability, hot rod potential, handling, etc? My old '68 was fine, but could not hold a candle to some built GT6+'s out there
- /html/triumphs/1997-07/msg00737.html (7,420 bytes)
- 3. Re: Opinions? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 97 15:41:44 EDT
- With the recent discussion of GT-6's, I'm reminded that there's a rather nice GT-6 Mk III for sale near me. As I recall its an early Mk III with the Rotoflex rear, and is a low mileage car having bee
- /html/triumphs/1997-07/msg00740.html (7,071 bytes)
- 4. re: Opinions? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: 15 Jul 97 15:44:38
- not a big fan of the Mk. III's either (they look too much like a 240Z, = plus smog stuff) ...<< They do? reason (like, you can get all the parts more easily).<< Well, there is a bit of parts crossov
- /html/triumphs/1997-07/msg00743.html (6,602 bytes)
- 5. Re: Opinions? (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 23:25:24 -0400 (EDT)
- I have a 70 GT6+ which I am in the process of modifying into a hot street machine. I road in a lister's 69 GT6+ last night that is set up for road racing with a mildly modified 2 liter engine and it
- /html/triumphs/1997-07/msg00786.html (7,202 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu