Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Off\-topic\s+question\s+no\s+LBC\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Off\-topic\s+question\s+no\s+LBC\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: "Mark Hooper" <mhooper@digiscreen.ca>; Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:49:01 -0400; Does anybody have an idea of the maximum sustained daily distance that a horse and rider can cover? I have often heard references to the fact that a man can carry food and run longer and farther than; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00533.html (7,746 bytes)
2. Re: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: Dave1massey@cs.com; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 07:58:17 EDT; I, too, have heard this. In fact the numbers I heard were 20 miles for a horse and rider and 40 miles for a man. Of course I think that all depends on how many tack shops are encountered along the wa; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00539.html (8,460 bytes)
3. RE: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: "Mark Hooper" <mhooper@digiscreen.ca>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:36:11 -0400; You've been driving a Triumph for how long and still haven't asked yourself if it wouldn't just be faster to get there on foot? ;^) I'm doing up a presentation related to digital technology and I've; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00542.html (9,815 bytes)
4. RE: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:01:57 -0700; Appears to vary widely. Lots of sources say "average" is 25 to 30; but it's possible to endurance train some horses for as much as 100 miles/day. http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=3908; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00543.html (9,626 bytes)
5. RE: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:03:57 -0700; I don't think anyone who's actually resorted to traveling on foot has any doubt about this ! Randall; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00544.html (7,952 bytes)
6. Re: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: Dave1massey@cs.com; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:49:06 EDT; I think more apropos is the fact that in spite the much more efficient superhighway systems and more powerful cars our commute times have been increasing since the 40's. Good luck Dave; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00548.html (9,028 bytes)
7. Re: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: Jim Barbuscia <jimbar@centurytel.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 08:57:28 -0700; Thats because in all that time we've done nothing to upgrade the "Nut behind the wheel" ! -jimb; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00549.html (9,114 bytes)
8. RE: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: "Randall" <tr3driver@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 10:44:30 -0700; I suspect that's more a function of commute distances increasing than reduced speeds. Even living near Los Angeles, I hit 75 on the way to work most mornings. Was close to 80 this morning when I saw; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00553.html (8,432 bytes)
9. RE: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:41:21 -0400; == I would have said it's more a function of increased traffic volume. I've lived in the same house now, and taken the same route to the same job now, for over 17 years, during which time my commute; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00557.html (8,608 bytes)
10. Re: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: AMfoto1@aol.com; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:39:43 EDT; Hi Mark, If memory serves, the Spanish missions in California were originally spaced up and down the coast one day's horseback ride apart - approximately 25-30 miles, give or take - allowing for terr; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00560.html (8,889 bytes)
11. Re: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: BearTranserv@aol.com; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:20:18 EDT; But I'm still confused as to how this ties into Triumphs. Dave He's simply trying to decide whether it is best to stow a pair of Reeboks in the trunk, or tow a horse trailer for the eventual breakdow; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00562.html (8,443 bytes)
12. Re: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: Dave1massey@cs.com; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:30:55 EDT; Which is my whole point. Mark was trying to draw an analogy between computers and the real world and the analogy is although computers are faster than ever, it still takes as long or longer to accomp; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00563.html (8,933 bytes)
13. Re: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: Dave1massey@cs.com; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:35:52 EDT; But Andy, you're still driving that old IBM XT...er Triumph Herald. ;-) Dave; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00564.html (8,453 bytes)
14. Re: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 21:04:30 EDT; But Andy, you're still driving that old IBM XT...er Triumph Herald. ;-) == Correct on the car (which, by the way, pulls better on hills than does my Honda Civic CX). But my home computer is a genuine; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00581.html (8,449 bytes)
15. Re: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: "T. S. White" <tswrace@pacbell.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 05:37:52 -0700; One thing that occurred to me last night was the was digital electronics has changed our environment. Do you remember when you went to bed at night and the room was dark? Maybe the brightest thing in; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00597.html (8,021 bytes)
16. Re: Off-topic question no LBC (score: 1): Author: Greg <one_second_zero@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 13:13:41 -0700 (PDT); When I watch old TV reruns or movies from the 70's or 80's in which people are trying to find a pay phone to call from, I like to shout "why don't you just use your cell phone!". My wife is never amu; /html/triumphs/2005-04/msg00625.html (8,187 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]