Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Brake\s+Fluids\s+\(DOT3\s+vs\s+DOT\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Brake\s+Fluids\s+\(DOT3\s+vs\s+DOT\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Brake Fluids (DOT3 vs DOT... (score: 1): Author: Johnmowog@aol.com; Date: Sat, 8 Jul 1995 17:32:01 -0400; Your included file failed to mention that DOT3 fluids will EAT the rubber parts of most lbcs. Also that DOT5 conversion not only requires rebuilding of system, but also a very complete flushing of al; /html/triumphs/1995-07/msg00100.html (7,740 bytes)
2. Re: Brake Fluids (DOT3 vs DOT... (score: 1): Author: TinyHost@aol.com; Date: Sat, 8 Jul 1995 19:33:49 -0400; John: I'm confused. What rubber parts are you referring to above? Can't be the brake components (near as I can tell) because the repair manuals tell one to lubricate the rubber seals with clean brake; /html/triumphs/1995-07/msg00101.html (7,316 bytes)
3. Re: Brake Fluids (DOT3 vs DOT... (score: 1): Author: Bill Sohl Budd Lake <billsohl@planet.net>; Date: Sun, 09 Jul 1995 18:49:48 -0700; I already posted another separate message before I came across this post. Bottom line...today's DOT 3 is NOT anything like the brake fluids sold 20/30/40 years ago for US automobiles. Whatever may ha; /html/triumphs/1995-07/msg00105.html (10,204 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]