Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Benefits\s+of\s+US\s+laws\s+$was\:\s+Copper\s+Brake\s+Piping\.\.\.$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Benefits\s+of\s+US\s+laws\s+$was\:\s+Copper\s+Brake\s+Piping\.\.\.$\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Benefits of US laws (was: Copper Brake Piping...) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 06:33:42 GMT; I know I should not involve myself into this ;-), but at least AFAIK I would not think YES is necessarily the right answer to this. My case in point, the US regulations re. headlights have been (and; /html/triumphs/1997-03/msg00843.html (9,044 bytes)
2. Re: Benefits of US laws (was: Copper Brake Piping...) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 18 Mar 1997 09:03:01 -0500 (EST); The main problem with U.S. emission controls is that European manufacturers didn't try to reduce emissions without reducing power or efficiency. This is while American manufacturers were installing c; /html/triumphs/1997-03/msg01002.html (9,855 bytes)
3. Re: Benefits of US laws (was: Copper Brake Piping...) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 10:35:23 -0800; I really have to disagree with you on that sir. The EPA knew then, and admits now, that they were well aware the technology wasn't there for the emissions reductions they were mandating, and that ma; /html/triumphs/1997-03/msg01225.html (10,381 bytes)
4. Re: Benefits of US laws (was: Copper Brake Piping...) (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Thu, 20 Mar 1997 13:47:38 -0500 (EST); I stand corrected on much of this. Thank you for that fascinating Jim Ruwaldt '72 TR6 (being restored, but will be drivable when the transmission's back in); /html/triumphs/1997-03/msg01231.html (11,495 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]