Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bead\s+blast\s+or\s+chemical\s+dip\s+body\s+and\s+panels\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Bead\s+blast\s+or\s+chemical\s+dip\s+body\s+and\s+panels\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Bead blast or chemical dip body and panels? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2003 19:51:04 -0700; Short time reader, first time poster. I have a question about what the list thinks is the better option for stripping the body and panels of a TR6. I know dipping does a good job, but I'm concerned t; /html/triumphs/2003-08/msg00076.html (7,261 bytes)
2. Re: Bead blast or chemical dip body and panels? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 22:01:32 -0500; Dip it! It will be a much more thorough rust remover. A blaster can't get into all the interior spots that almost certainly have rust in them. /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http; /html/triumphs/2003-08/msg00077.html (8,015 bytes)
3. Re: Bead blast or chemical dip body and panels? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 22:01:32 -0500; Dip it! It will be a much more thorough rust remover. A blaster can't get into all the interior spots that almost certainly have rust in them. /// triumphs@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http; /html/triumphs/2003-08/msg00078.html (8,043 bytes)
4. Re: Bead blast or chemical dip body and panels? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2003 21:23:58 -0700; I had the exterior panels of my TR3A dipped. There has been no seepage I am aware of. Of course the panels were off the tub at the time. That was in the mid eighties. Regards, Tom; /html/triumphs/2003-08/msg00081.html (6,993 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]