- 1. RE: "GT4" (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:47:37 +0200
- Hi Andy . Thanks for the information and sincere apologies for not responding earlier . I returned to the office on Monday 15 Jan. and it's taken me up till now to read through all the mail and finis
- /html/triumphs/2001-01/msg00916.html (9,159 bytes)
- 2. RE: "GT4" (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 10:33:59 EST
- << What is meant by a 70X or 79X engine ? >> The "70X" is the "Works" (Factory) eight-port head racing 1147, with either cast iron or alloy head (and that nice little pair of Weber carbs and other mo
- /html/triumphs/2001-01/msg00921.html (6,940 bytes)
- 3. RE: "GT4" (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 16:05:04 +0200
- Thanks for the clarification Andy .... and no , I don't have any of those in my barn :-) Kind regards . Chris de Wet . TSCC membership number : 356 . '56 TR 3 ( TS 10795 ) + '64 Spitfire 4 Mk 1 ( FC
- /html/triumphs/2001-01/msg01051.html (8,070 bytes)
- 4. Re: "GT4" (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:58:21 EST
- That's a good start. All you need now is the thin-gauge steel chassis (or a "stock" one with lots of lightening holes drilled into it, depending on which version you're trying to replicate), some all
- /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00639.html (7,115 bytes)
- 5. RE: "GT4" (score: 1)
- Author: Unknown
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 19:10:10 -0800
- As a 1970 GT6+ (ok, so it's a convertable) owner; I can't begin to tell you how wrong the term "GT4" sounds to me. Alright, maybe if you stuffed one of those 2.5 liter TR4 puppies in there. Now there
- /html/triumphs/2000-12/msg00672.html (6,399 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu