- 1. Re: elections (score: 1)
- Author: tiger technologies <tartanad@ix18.ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 11:22:45 -0800
- Congratulations to you and our new prez Dan Walters. that office holders CANNOT be involved in any business regarding the marque. I am afraid that by going against the by-laws, the club is opening i
- /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00104.html (9,365 bytes)
- 2. Re: elections (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 12:36:57 -0800
- Jeff, Bruce, et Listers, They say those who forget history are destined to repeat it. So it may go with the history behind the CAT bylaws regarding conflict-of-interest for officers. I believe the by
- /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00105.html (11,306 bytes)
- 3. Re: elections (score: 1)
- Author: tiger technologies <tartanad@ix18.ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 12:55:30 -0800
-
- /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00106.html (12,213 bytes)
- 4. Re: elections (score: 1)
- Author: tiger technologies <tartanad@ix13.ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 12:56:48 -0800
- not only is the election of officers reckless, but it is illegal as per the by-laws of C.A.T. And Mr. Alcala's abdication from his prez duties was in name only. He did and has worked on Tigers and A
- /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00107.html (12,975 bytes)
- 5. Re: elections (score: 1)
- Author: Ramon Spontelli <ramon-s@pacbell.net>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 19:59:04 -0800
- That is exactly what you are supposed to believe, Bob. That's the pile they fed us when they adopted the "conflict of interest" clause. In reality, it was not needed then, as it is not needed now. A
- /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00111.html (8,257 bytes)
- 6. Re: elections (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 22:06:23 -0800
- Ramon, et Listers, You may know much better than I what was in the minds and hearts of those who adopted the "conflict of interest" by-law Ramon. However, I have been witness to several people who sa
- /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00114.html (10,060 bytes)
- 7. Re: elections (score: 1)
- Author: Ramon Spontelli <ramon-s@pacbell.net>
- Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1998 23:31:13 -0800
- Exactly, Bob, which part of "may be removed, with or without cause" is it that you don't understand? Or maybe it was the "at any time" that's confusing? Explain to me, please, why it is that if the
- /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00115.html (8,409 bytes)
- 8. Re: elections (score: 1)
- Author: Karen L Foster <Karen.L.Foster@aero.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 07:31:06 -0800
- Karen That is exactly what you are supposed to believe, Bob. That's the pile they fed us when they adopted the "conflict of interest" clause. In reality, it was not needed then, as it is not needed
- /html/tigers/1998-12/msg00138.html (8,746 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu