Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NACA\/NASA\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NACA\/NASA\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. NACA/NASA (score: 1): Author: "Tim Jordan" <tjordan@wagnerprocess.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 10:27:02 -0800; What does NACA and NASA refer to with respect to the Tiger hoods? I have heard the terms used regarding Mach 1 hoods. Of course we know about the "Space Agency", but I'm not positive on the actual m; /html/tigers/1999-01/msg00191.html (6,623 bytes)
2. Re: NACA/NASA (score: 1): Author: Will Seay <wseay@sprynet.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 12:43:18 -0500; ** Tim, The Space Agency was formed from the old NACA. I think NACA stands for National Aeronautics and Civil Aviation. Anyhow, the duct design was the result of NACA research. Conventional air ducts; /html/tigers/1999-01/msg00213.html (7,525 bytes)
3. Re: NACA/NASA (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 12:09:09 -0800; Regarding the LAT hood rear ducts: There is too much 'coincidence' in the shape not to have been inspired by that design, but I agree that the aerodynamic formulae were probably not used, as much as; /html/tigers/1999-01/msg00214.html (7,191 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]