Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Density\s+versus\s+Boost\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Density\s+versus\s+Boost\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Density versus Boost (score: 1): Author: "Jim Ferrara" <jferrara@icdc.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:17:03 -0500; Forget pressure ratio (or boost). What the engine needs for more power is an increase in density ratio which is a function of both pressure and temperature. For the sake of argument, let's assume th; /html/tigers/2000-12/msg00107.html (9,650 bytes)
2. Re: Density versus Boost (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <Laifman@flash.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 11:16:22 -0800; Thanks for the work you have done on boost formulae, and the exacting analyses. I do not want to get into any discussion here on who is "more right" on a simple statement about the order of magnitud; /html/tigers/2000-12/msg00109.html (8,100 bytes)
3. RE: Density versus Boost (score: 1): Author: "Ronak, TP (Timothy)" <Timothy.P.Ronak@akzo-nobel.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 13:41:18 -0600; With regards to the Boost conversations, IMHO "There is no "REPLACEMENT" for "DISPLACEMENT" that is why I am going to build a 350 stroker. Regards, Tim Jim, Thanks for the work you have done on boos; /html/tigers/2000-12/msg00110.html (9,239 bytes)
4. RE: Density versus Boost (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <theo.smit@intel.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 07:31:07 -0800; Not to continue an already overextended thread, but doing the math is what separates the successful turbo (or supercharger) installations from the ones that blow up after 30 seconds of full throttle.; /html/tigers/2000-12/msg00114.html (8,522 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]