Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Dynomax\s+Turbo\s+vs\s+Magnaflow\s+XL\s+Turbo\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Tigers\]\s+Dynomax\s+Turbo\s+vs\s+Magnaflow\s+XL\s+Turbo\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Tigers] Dynomax Turbo vs Magnaflow XL Turbo (score: 1): Author: "Mike Michels" <mmichels@socal.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:41:36 -0800; I'm considering two choices to replace my current Magnaflow straight through mufflers, which were fine with the 260, but very harsh now that I have a heavily modified 289 producing much more percuss; /html/tigers/2009-12/msg00207.html (7,715 bytes)
2. Re: [Tigers] Dynomax Turbo vs Magnaflow XL Turbo (score: 1): Author: "Thomas Witt" <atwittsend@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 23:55:33 -0800; I hear ya (or better said, can't hear ya) on that. Even the 50 series on my 318 Valiant has an unbearable drone from 2,000 RPM to its immediate cut off point at 2,600 RPM. I have the Dynomax on my T; /html/tigers/2009-12/msg00208.html (7,043 bytes)
3. Re: [Tigers] Dynomax Turbo vs Magnaflow XL Turbo (score: 1): Author: "Bill Waite" <fordlandia@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:26:46 -0500; I'm not sure about Flowmaster 40's... but the Flowmasters I have (not sure of the exact model) on our Mark II are perfect. Fairly quiet while cruising... but when you hit the go pedal, the sound they; /html/tigers/2009-12/msg00212.html (9,268 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]