- 1. '66 Tiger for 2K (score: 1)
- Author: "Tim Jordan" <tjordan@wagnerprocess.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 14:23:56 -0800
- I called the owner/broker/numbskull about the '62 Tiger this a.m. He said that the newspaper had made a misprint and indeed it is a '66 Tiger. Next question, what is the ID# and JAL#? Response was "
- /html/tigers/1999-01/msg00296.html (8,723 bytes)
- 2. Re: '66 Tiger for 2K (score: 1)
- Author: "Chris Richards" <richards@northcoast.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 17:03:28 -0500
- .......filling the brake and clutch, pumping them up.....works ok.....prime the carb.......wow, the battary has a charge....cranking the engine.....immediate firing.....die.....another prime......rum
- /html/tigers/1999-01/msg00299.html (10,145 bytes)
- 3. Re: '66 Tiger for 2K (score: 1)
- Author: Bob Palmer <rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:17:14 -0800
- As Maxwell Smart used to say: "Missed it by that much!" Robert L. Palmer Dept. of AMES, Univ. of Calif., San Diego rpalmer@ames.ucsd.edu rpalmer@cts.com
- /html/tigers/1999-01/msg00300.html (7,466 bytes)
- 4. Re: '66 Tiger for 2K (score: 1)
- Author: "Tim Jordan" <tjordan@wagnerprocess.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 09:32:34 -0800
- Absolutely great call! Max may also have said, "Would you believe a MKII Prototype?" "How about the Miles Mystery #50 Tiger?" Sorry Chief. Tim -- <tjordan@wagnerprocess.com>; tigers <tigers@autox.te
- /html/tigers/1999-01/msg00319.html (8,235 bytes)
- 5. Re: '66 Tiger for 2K (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Laifman <laifman@flash.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 16:07:44 -0800
- Tim, I think the missing #50 Miles car (an ALL of his cars were raced with the number '50', as Phil Hill's number was '2') that's being sought is the "Flying Shingle". This was an MG based car and wa
- /html/tigers/1999-01/msg00329.html (7,860 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu