Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NO\s+LBC\:\s+Re\:\s+Not\s+for\s+Medical\s+Use\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*NO\s+LBC\:\s+Re\:\s+Not\s+for\s+Medical\s+Use\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. NO LBC: Re: Not for Medical Use (score: 1): Author: richard.arnold@juno.com; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 00:55:58 -0500; Warning: Non-LBC, long, rambling, somewhat disjointed, and I really should be doing homework.... When I first heard (back in '96) of the "Lawn Mower" case, it was presented as a products liability hy; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01301.html (13,212 bytes)
2. Re: NO LBC: Re: Not for Medical Use (score: 1): Author: Larry Macy <macy@bblmail.psycha.upenn.edu>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:14:51 -0400; Well thought out response to what at times seems to be a hugely blown out of proprtion problem (lawyers and courts) I think the media is at much at fault in some of these things as they tend to sens; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01309.html (8,225 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]