Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sacralige\s+or\s+\?\?\?\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*sacralige\s+or\s+\?\?\?\?\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. sacralige or ???? (score: 1): Author: larry hooven <dirty_howi@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 05:22:24 -0700 (PDT); <flame suit> Listerati, i am considering the purchase of another LBC, a 1973 MG MGB. (hence the flame suit). it appears to be not unlike the spitfire in configuration, can any of you closet mg owners; /html/spitfires/2000-08/msg00149.html (8,289 bytes)
2. RE: sacralige or ???? (score: 1): Author: Davies William-qswi646 <William.M.Davies@motorola.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 14:25:18 +0100; Larry, Having previously owned a 1968 B for about 8 years, I can tell you firsthand that it is a very different animal to the Spitfire. I liked the B a lot, but it was a much heavier car - far more; /html/spitfires/2000-08/msg00150.html (9,919 bytes)
3. Re: sacralige or ???? (score: 1): Author: Douglas Braun & Nadia Papakonstantinou <dougnad@bellatlantic.net>; Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2000 09:42:52 -0400; Myself, I've always wanted to see a reasonably objective comparison of the MGB and Spitfire. I am not that familiar with MGs (at least compared to Triumphs!). Back when I bought my car and I was cons; /html/spitfires/2000-08/msg00151.html (8,853 bytes)
4. RE: sacralige or ???? (score: 1): Author: Craig Smith <CraigS@iewc.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:09:32 -0500; I've owned both, a 66 B and my present 71 Spit. There is a difference in the "feel" . When I'm in the Spit it feels like I am part of the car if that makes sense. I felt a little insulated in the B,; /html/spitfires/2000-08/msg00152.html (9,807 bytes)
5. Re: sacralige or ???? (score: 1): Author: Laura.G@141.com (Laura Gharazeddine); Date: Mon, Aug 7 2000 10:32:26 GMT-0600; I don't own an MGB, but a friend of mine bought a '67 that had been stored in someone's yard under a cover for 20 years! It runs beautifully! Very strong-only needs a bit of new paint and a new hood; /html/spitfires/2000-08/msg00157.html (9,641 bytes)
6. RE: sacralige or ???? (score: 1): Author: Craig Smith <CraigS@iewc.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 15:25:23 -0500; Sorry I don't Someone out in e-mail land might have a Haynes manual for a MGB Thanks for the info. BTW, do you know the weight and HP of a MGB? Doug with any being annoy; /html/spitfires/2000-08/msg00172.html (10,765 bytes)
7. Re: sacralige or ???? (score: 1): Author: FODFARTS@cs.com; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 21:57:29 EDT; If I remember correctly a chrome bumper MGB weighs just over 2000 pounds ready to go, and produced around 90 hp. The rubber bumper versions weighed 300lbs more and produced about 65 hp. Gotta love th; /html/spitfires/2000-08/msg00180.html (7,324 bytes)
8. RE: sacralige or ???? (score: 1): Author: "JM Weber" <weberjm@teleport.com>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2000 09:25:01 -0700; I found it quite amusing that you mispelled Ralph's last name into something that also describes him quite well; as in "...extreme point of orbit or eccentric revolution..." It got me thinking again; /html/spitfires/2000-08/msg00185.html (8,098 bytes)
9. Fwd: sacralige or ???? (score: 1): Author: FODFARTS@cs.com; Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 01:22:35 EDT; --part1_c8.8adfa14.26c0f31b_boundary Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: <FODFARTS@cs.com> From: FODFARTS@cs.com Full-name: FOD FARTS Message-ID: <76.1e605fb.26c0f2e9@cs.com> Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2; /html/spitfires/2000-08/msg00188.html (7,532 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]