Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*oiler\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*oiler\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. oiler (score: 1): Author: "Fred Thomas" <vafred@erols.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:49:05 -0500; What is the collective wisdom of the list on the rocker arm oiler for a 4 cycl, this is for a average (high speed on the interstate) driver use, any advatages or not needed ??? "FT" /// spitfires@aut; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00104.html (6,732 bytes)
2. Re: oiler (score: 1): Author: "Nolan Penney" <npenney@mde.state.md.us>; Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:02:28 -0500; In going through a number of damaged/destroyed Spitfire engines I have never seen one that suffered from lack of oil to the rocker arms. Nor have I ever heard of one suffering from this. I suspect th; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00106.html (7,259 bytes)
3. RE: oiler (score: 1): Author: "Bowen, Patrick" <pbowen@intellinetics.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 15:08:28 -0500; Fred, with no heavy personal knowledge. I am inclined to believe that (if operating correctly) enough is put up there to begin with and that the bearings need all they can get. I also think that if I; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00107.html (6,971 bytes)
4. Re: oiler (score: 1): Author: Bradley D Richardson <bradrichardson@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:25:36 -0800; Previous e-mails convinced me to send the one I bought back. They should be in the archives. Brad == On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:49:05 -0500 "Fred Thomas" <vafred@erols.com> writes: _____________________; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00110.html (7,265 bytes)
5. oiler (score: 1): Author: "Fred Thomas" <vafred@erols.com>; Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 20:00:05 -0500; Well here are the results, =0= "do-it", and 18 don't do it, as usual when in doubt just ask this list. Thanks "FT" /// spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/maj; /html/spitfires/2001-12/msg00123.html (6,696 bytes)
6. oiler (score: 1): Author: "Fred Thomas" <vafred@erols.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 17:43:34 -0400; Listers, thanks so very much for all of the replys (over 20), not one single reply said it is needed, more harm than good, so it stays in the box, and a return is headed for TRF. "FT"; /html/spitfires/2000-04/msg00696.html (6,184 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]