Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfires\s+on\s+TV\s+$Atomic\s+Train$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spitfires\s+on\s+TV\s+$Atomic\s+Train$\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Spitfires on TV (Atomic Train) (score: 1): Author: Laura.G@141.com (Laura Gharazeddine); Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:26:15 -0700; What really surprises me is that for a movie that got terrible reviews and lousy ratings-how many people in just this one forum have actually seen it! Scary? Laura G. Vita brevis est: rapide agite, v; /html/spitfires/2000-12/msg00232.html (6,929 bytes)
2. Re: Spitfires on TV (Atomic Train) (score: 1): Author: Ken Strayhorn <ken@dukecomm.duke.edu>; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:00:00 -0500; Laura beat me to it: Hey, my excuse is that my son was watching it. Of course, he's only 10. But even he found it silly . . . what's really scary is that the network actually ran disclaimers after ea; /html/spitfires/2000-12/msg00233.html (7,349 bytes)
3. Re: Spitfires on TV (Atomic Train) (score: 1): Author: Tburke4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 16:22:19 EST; And...after the original broadcast, they offered to sell videotapes to people who wanted to watch it again and again. As Robson would say, Bloody Cheek! Tom Burke 80 Spit; /html/spitfires/2000-12/msg00234.html (7,297 bytes)
4. Re: Spitfires on TV (Atomic Train) (score: 1): Author: Robert Gunther <rjgunthe@bellatlantic.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 21:05:58 -0500; I still like "Motel Hell" and "The Attack of the Killer Tomatoes" !!!!!; /html/spitfires/2000-12/msg00241.html (7,244 bytes)
5. Re: Spitfires on TV (Atomic Train) (score: 1): Author: "Randy Woodward" <r.woodward@home.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 23:32:02 -0600; lousy ratings-how many people in just this one forum have actually seen it! Seen it? I've never even heard of it.; /html/spitfires/2000-12/msg00242.html (7,270 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]