Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spit\s+safety\s+question\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Spit\s+safety\s+question\.\.\.\s*$/: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Spit safety question... (score: 1): Author: "Andrew J. Braverman" <ajb23@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu>; Date: Wed, 29 Jul 1998 23:10:56 -0400; It is generally accepted that the front seat of any car (even those with more sheet metal than a spit) is unacceptable for a child/child seat... I guess unless you can convince yourself that the rear; /html/spitfires/1998-07/msg00348.html (8,196 bytes)
22. Re[2]: Spit safety question... (score: 1): Author: Pat.Catchpole@netc.co.uk (Pat Catchpole); Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 10:00:01 +0100; This is the sort of question where everyone can, and will, have their own opinion. My thoughts are as follows: If a child is properly secured in a seat designed for the size / weight of that child, a; /html/spitfires/1998-07/msg00349.html (10,267 bytes)
23. Re: Spit safety question... (score: 1): Author: "jonmac" <jonmac@ndirect.co.uk>; Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 07:38:28 +0100; seat her? Remember, the passenger seat was there long before we started carrying children in backward facing child seats. I greatly doubt the retaining catch (if still fitted) would hold. It was NEV; /html/spitfires/1998-07/msg00358.html (8,286 bytes)
24. Re: Spit safety question... (score: 1): Author: "jonmac" <jonmac@ndirect.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 09:38:07 +0100; Referring to the last messages the catch not I hadn't been too sure about your seat catch until yesterday, when I looked at the last Spitfire made which is permanently housed at Gaydon. Things have; /html/spitfires/1998-07/msg00374.html (11,210 bytes)
25. Re: Spit safety question... (score: 1): Author: Reed Mideke <rmideke@interbase.com>; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 16:03:53 -0700; Hmmm... All the child seats I've seen are secured by the seatbelt, and not attached in any other way to the car or seat. Thus the preference for non inertial reel belts. I'd say in a crash, a small l; /html/spitfires/1998-07/msg00375.html (7,832 bytes)
26. Re: Spit safety question... (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 17:59:48 -0700; This whole safety issue hit home yesterday when I was driving home. As I started around a bend in the road, I noticed all sorts of flares burning on both sides of the road. As I rounded the bend, I s; /html/spitfires/1998-07/msg00376.html (8,891 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 26
Page: [1] [2]