- 1. Re: Flushing sug. for brakes (kinda long as usual :-}) (score: 1)
- Author: Barry Schwartz <bschwart@pacbell.net>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 08:00:00 -0700
- ** Kevin (cc'd Triumphs and Spitfires also) Before you do this you may or may not find my observations interesting, so I'll post them for your own conclusions. . . About a year ago I decided to repl
- /html/spitfires/2000-09/msg00339.html (11,691 bytes)
- 2. Re: Flushing sug. for brakes (kinda long as usual :-}) (score: 1)
- Author: Douglas Braun & Nadia Papakonstantinou <dougnad@bellatlantic.net>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2000 12:05:40 -0400
- I'm familiar with fluid and fluif, but what is "fliuf"? Doug Braun '72 Spit
- /html/spitfires/2000-09/msg00343.html (7,070 bytes)
- 3. Flushing sug. for brakes (kinda long as usual :-}) (score: 1)
- Author: LT <llst@telus.net>
- Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2000 01:50:13 -0700
- That ("fliuf ") would be the DOT 5 version. Perhaps Joe could give this usage his blessing. Larry Ternowski Surrey BC I'm familiar with fluid and fluif, but what is "fliuf"? Doug Braun '72 Spit
- /html/spitfires/2000-09/msg00376.html (7,210 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu