Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ZoboHerald@aol.com: 205 ]

Total 205 documents matching your query.

81. Re: Mk3 Windshield Wipers (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:08:40 -0500
Many NAPA stores carry 11" blades in their "classic" (or some such named) line. --Andy Mace
/html/spitfires/2004-01/msg00021.html (7,043 bytes)

82. Re: Spit body lifting (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:19:40 EST
According to the Herald/Spitfire factory workshop manual, one makes lifting brackets to replace those for the bonnet catches. Then one attaches one's "lifting tackle" to those two points and to "the
/html/spitfires/2004-01/msg00063.html (8,278 bytes)

83. Re: Making a Spit bonnet fit a GT6 (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 09:34:20 -0500
Steve replied: Several years ago, a friend and I "rescued" a very rusty but mostly complete "Mk1" GT6 from a junkyard, where it had spent a dozen or so years atop a shed roof (go figure)! We wondered
/html/spitfires/2003-12/msg00015.html (8,022 bytes)

84. Re: Restoration project on Ebay, trans wanted (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 12:12:25 -0500
Cool! And originally one of my favorite round-tail Spitfire colors: Jasmine Yellow. But then, the Kaiser Manhattan in the background looks pretty cool, too.... :-) --Andy (no more projects for me, pl
/html/spitfires/2003-12/msg00030.html (7,409 bytes)

85. Re: Spitfire/GT6 center dash interchangeability? (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:19:22 -0500
Ken, yes, it will work. I assume, from your description, that you have sourced a GT6 dash that happens to have had an oil pressure gauge installed? Originally, the GT6 had the same instrumentation as
/html/spitfires/2003-12/msg00052.html (7,643 bytes)

86. Re: L General running question (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:37:42 -0500
Jonmac replied: Agreed. But it also seems to me that the problem could simply be a bit of crud in said needle valve. If you're lucky, a shot of carb cleaner might cure the problem without any disasse
/html/spitfires/2003-12/msg00061.html (7,448 bytes)

87. Re: Transmission (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 17:41:20 EST
Joe, read the original message again. The second gearbox is a "KC" gearbox. If unaltered on the inside, etc., that means it's a GT6 gearbox, and in most cases the ratios simply aren't suitable for th
/html/spitfires/2003-12/msg00067.html (8,459 bytes)

88. Re: (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 09:49:07 -0500
I'm sure someone can come up with one. Note, however, that they were NOT routinely fitted on the Mk3 "Federal" cars and really aren't needed. You might get lucky and find a good used set at a reasona
/html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00032.html (7,228 bytes)

89. Re: Rear suspension (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 09:57:14 -0500
Short answer? Yes. It requires welding the appropriate lower wishbone brackets to the existing chassis and working out the shock absorber issue. The original swing-axle shock mounting will foul the r
/html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00033.html (7,560 bytes)

90. Re: 64 MK2 Spitfire ??? & seltbelt mount question. (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 18:20:31 EST
Correct! Question for you: Does the "?" in each number above represent a number you can't read or prefer not to quote? I'm assuming yes based on the engine number you quoted. That would put it well i
/html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00065.html (9,831 bytes)

91. Re: 64 MK2 Spitfire ??? & seltbelt mount question. (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 19:51:16 EST
Just to clarify: the early (through Mk2) rear bumpers had overriders. The later Mk3 bumpers were mounted higher and had NO overriders. You'd also mentioned backup lights. Are they in addition to the
/html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00068.html (7,633 bytes)

92. Re: 70 spit w/ Stromberg (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:47:26 EST
All else being equal, this is a relatively quick, simple and not very expensive way of gaining about 10-15% power. SUs are really quite simple in and of themselves, not difficult to set up (balance)
/html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00099.html (7,825 bytes)

93. Re: 70 Gt6+ Brake caliper (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:14:48 EST
Look in any "good" auto parts store. There are insert/bleed screw kits available just for this sort of problem. --Andy Mace *Mrs Irrelevant: Oh, is it a jet? *Man: Well, no ... It's not so much of a
/html/spitfires/2003-11/msg00109.html (7,641 bytes)

94. Re: Crank pulley (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:06:28 EDT
Bob, as a point of reference, for whatever it's worth, I checked an original 1972 Spitfire MkIV currently in my care (and for sale, but that's another story). I didn't actually measure anything, but
/html/spitfires/2003-10/msg00007.html (7,989 bytes)

95. Re: Is this a Triumph Herald? (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:56:37 -0400
Uh....NO! Windscreen frame is wrong. Not much else to judge from ,but it might be an early Honda Civic or something of that ilk. --Andy Mace
/html/spitfires/2003-10/msg00060.html (6,819 bytes)

96. Re: GT 6 Drivers door glass needed!!! OOOPS!!!!!!! (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 19:14:06 EDT
Well, yes...and no. There is no difference *per se*; the same part numbers (810042 for RH and 810041 for LH) are listed for all GT6s, according to the appropriate factory Spare Parts Catalogues. Howe
/html/spitfires/2003-09/msg00018.html (8,185 bytes)

97. Re: GT 6 Drivers door glass needed!!! OOOPS!!!!!!! (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 19:31:08 EDT
Apparently not, if the GT6 Mk3 Graphic (Parts) Catalogue is to be believed. I believe the changes to the roof for the Mk3 were seen mostly in the rear. But even the "back door" (as the SPC refers to
/html/spitfires/2003-09/msg00019.html (7,969 bytes)

98. Re: [RECOVERED] Oil pressure gauge (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:18:57 EDT
It's usually fed from the same hole in which the idiot light sender resides. "T" fittings are available should you wish to have both the gauge and the idiot light. --Andy Mace *Mrs Irrelevant: Oh, is
/html/spitfires/2003-09/msg00033.html (7,497 bytes)

99. Re: Seatbelts & Early Spitfires (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:31:56 EDT
The change actually occured sometime after the introduction of the Mk2 model, I think somewhere in the FC55xxx range? Seems to me it would be a fair bit of work to fit the proper latches to the "B" p
/html/spitfires/2003-09/msg00077.html (9,139 bytes)

100. Re: Carb Linkage? (score: 1)
Author: ZoboHerald@aol.com
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:41:29 -0400
Actually, I believe that might be 1971 or later GT6 (a.k.a. Mk3 model). My August 1969-built 1970 model GT6+ has the linkage with those *!%^#%@ plastic ball-end links. --Andy Mace /// spitfires@autox
/html/spitfires/2003-09/msg00109.html (7,333 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu