- 1. Re: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1)
- Author: "Adam Parrott" <parrotta@usa.net>
- Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 22:41:03 -0500
- The '89 B9Bx program also commanded an average of 6 degrees more spark advance than did it's younger '92-'95 X2J brother, which might account for some of the '89 SHO's added "quickness" over it's you
- /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00159.html (9,576 bytes)
- 2. Re: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1)
- Author: "Adam Parrott" <parrotta@usa.net>
- Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2006 23:22:11 -0500
- While both B9B calibrations (B9B and B9B1) command more overall spark than the X2J, I was actually referring specifically to the 49-state '89 B9B program in my post. Adam I've never seen that. When y
- /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00161.html (10,423 bytes)
- 3. Re: [Shotimes] Best SHO (was Global Warming) (score: 1)
- Author: "Adam Parrott" <parrotta@usa.net>
- Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 20:24:09 -0500
- Actually, I need to correct myself. :-x Upon further research, I have discovered that I accidentally referenced Superchip-based B9B and B9B1 images (which command more spark than factory) in my origi
- /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00196.html (9,754 bytes)
- 4. [Shotimes] TwEECerSHO Dyno Results (score: 1)
- Author: "Adam Parrott" <parrotta@usa.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 22:09:45 -0500
- For those of you who don't frequent the SHOForum and might be interested, I thought I would give you a glimpse into what a LC 3.3L motor is capable of when governed by a proper tune. The following fi
- /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00324.html (8,583 bytes)
- 5. Re: [Shotimes] new y-pipe purchase (score: 1)
- Author: "Adam Parrott" <parrotta@usa.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:02:33 -0500
- While we're at it, I figured I would also add that: a) SHOs (like most gasoline engines) do NOT require backpressure to make power. b) any "loss" that is experienced or measured from the use of a cat
- /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00394.html (10,201 bytes)
- 6. Re: [Shotimes] new y-pipe purchase (score: 1)
- Author: "Adam Parrott" <parrotta@usa.net>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:00:00 -0500
- While Jon almost hit the nail on the head, I feel I should step in and add a bit of clarity to my original statement before things start to get out of control. When I said that SHO engines do NOT req
- /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00398.html (11,514 bytes)
- 7. Re: [Shotimes] new y-pipe purchase (score: 1)
- Author: "Adam Parrott" <parrotta@usa.net>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:35:33 -0500
- Coming in late after a busy weekend to close out this thread ... probably always show a peak HP increase on a dyno, but it will be at the expense of killing the torque below that point. And you can't
- /html/shotimes/2006-08/msg00438.html (10,226 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu