Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Motor\s+mount\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+Motor\s+mount\s+question\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] Motor mount question (score: 1): Author: Ryan Sain <rsain@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 08:57:39 -0700; Hi all, I'll try this again... We have one last thing to do before the frame goes to paint. And that is to fit the motor/tranny. We have a 283 and would like to use side motor mounts. There are MANY; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00062.html (7,913 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] Motor mount question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 09:38:40 -0700; I know the early 265 did not have side mount bosses. I think the first 283s did not either. Its unlikely yours is that early, but I'd suggest you verify it first. The side mount cross members I've se; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00063.html (8,727 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] Motor mount question (score: 1): Author: Ryan Sain <rsain@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 09:53:33 -0700; This 283 is out of a 70's model car and does have the side mount bosses. Thanks! - Ryan oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00064.html (9,405 bytes)
4. Re: [oletrucks] Motor mount question (score: 1): Author: ke6bnl@juno.com; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 10:43:38 -0700; One advantage to using the one piece side mount you could probably measure the same amount vertically on the frame to located the mount. the mounts will allow you to set the motor at any angle front; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00065.html (9,951 bytes)
5. Re: [oletrucks] Motor mount question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 10:53:09 -0700; Somebody might have put a 283 in a 70's car, but it was not the original motor. Last year for the 283 was '67 or '68. But if it was installed in a 70's car it must have the bosses... Steve, This 283; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00066.html (9,906 bytes)
6. Re: [oletrucks] Motor mount question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 11:34:42 -0700; Good point Ed. Pinion angle and motor angle need to be considered together! One advantage to using the one piece side mount you could probably measure the same amount vertically on the frame to locat; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00067.html (10,419 bytes)
7. Re: [oletrucks] Motor mount question (score: 1): Author: Ryan Sain <rsain@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 12:46:44 -0700; Oops! I must have written down the wrong casting numbers... I'll check that Thanks for the heads up! Ed - good points - I wasn't aware that if the intake is level that the motor is sitting at 3deg. V; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00068.html (10,656 bytes)
8. Re: [oletrucks] Motor mount question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@OldSub.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:21:26 -0700; Back in the fuel rationing days of the 70s I put 283 'power pack' heads on a '68 350 which I ran in a '70 Blazer. I used a small Holley card and a mild cam, all trying to get intake velocity up, to i; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00069.html (11,623 bytes)
9. Re: [oletrucks] Motor mount question (score: 1): Author: "Spencer" <wits_end@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:52:55 -0700; Ryan. I was hoping to see some answeres on this one myself. I'm probably six months away from motor and tranny mounts on my '55 1st Series. For what it is worth, I built a '37 Chevy sedan years ago u; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00070.html (9,085 bytes)
10. Re: [oletrucks] Motor mount question (score: 1): Author: "K. M. Lehmann" <klehmann@bentonrea.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:12:36 -0700; If you have bellhousing mounts side motor mounts are not required nor recomended. The theory here is 3 point powertrain mounting, the simplest way to achieve smooth vibration free mounting. You didn; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00071.html (9,250 bytes)
11. Re: [oletrucks] Motor mount question (score: 1): Author: "Gary Perry" <glperry@fwi.com>; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:39:59 -0500; Ryan, I have done little in swaps but let me try. Most of the mounts offered are all the same ones, just different distributors. There is the common tube type that dips under engine, has square plate; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00073.html (10,905 bytes)
12. Re: [oletrucks] Motor mount question (score: 1): Author: "K Ohlgren" <kjohlgren@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2003 22:48:19 +0000; what type of truck? stock or mustII crossmember? i have a 58 3100 w/ mustII that i am building motor mounts for that mount on the crossmember. i can show you what i'm doing.i cut out a set of small; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00129.html (10,693 bytes)
13. Re: [oletrucks] Motor mount question (score: 1): Author: Ryan Sain <rsain@gte.net>; Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 09:49:45 -0700; Truck is a 59 Stepside. Mustang II x-member from TCI. Frame is fabricated from scratch - using 2x6" tube steel. See http://www.wsu.edu/~rsain click on Apache. I would enjoy taking a look at what you; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00136.html (11,292 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]