- 21. Re: [oletrucks] IFS brand recommendation (score: 1)
- Author: "Claude" <cramey@dashlink.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:22:51 -0500
- This picture was very interesting to me because of the squared or boxed A frames. I always thought the tubular A frames looked out of place on a truck. Nice for a small rod but looked out of place on
- /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00170.html (10,852 bytes)
- 22. Re: [oletrucks] IFS brand recommendation (score: 1)
- Author: "G. Simmons" <gls@4link.net>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 19:04:59 -0700
- was to Bob, any idea when the frames became unweldable? Regards, Grant S. oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
- /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00173.html (9,032 bytes)
- 23. Re: [oletrucks] IFS brand recommendation (score: 1)
- Author: New Mexico Jim <ADvent@thuntek.net>
- Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2000 20:37:29 -0600
- My guess is that it is more cost effective to use rivits. oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
- /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00174.html (9,669 bytes)
- 24. Re: [oletrucks] IFS brand recommendation (score: 1)
- Author: "Don Simmons" <tasimmons@cbnn.net>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 20:51:24 -0700
- Before you start making negative statements about suspension that you know nothing about, why don't you take the time to check it out first? I'm not starting a mustang II war, I'm just informing peop
- /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00177.html (17,776 bytes)
- 25. Re: [oletrucks] IFS brand recommendation (score: 1)
- Author: "william moldenhauer" <wmh678@worldnet.att.net>
- Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 07:43:12 -0700
- one more point to a well written response.I was talking to my buddy at the speed shop and he had a rather surprising remark to my question of which ifs he thought was the best performer he stated tha
- /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00252.html (17,737 bytes)
- 26. Re: [oletrucks] IFS brand recommendation (score: 1)
- Author: "joe" <chevy1@jps.net>
- Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 12:34:03 -0700
- Oh mines on the road and with enough trophies to satisfy that part of the sport. Now the awards are no big deal and I just enjoy driving the truck when time allows. Joe Garcia Yuba City, CA 1950 Chev
- /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00256.html (19,618 bytes)
- 27. Re: [oletrucks] IFS brand recommendation (score: 1)
- Author: "Old GMC Pickup" <truxrme@hotmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2000 14:50:24 CDT
- So, after the storm has calmed Have we decided who is the best for IFS? I lean toward Heidts, the catalog has all the info you need to get basic info.. Shawn _________________________________________
- /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00258.html (22,079 bytes)
- 28. Re: [oletrucks] IFS brand recommendation (score: 1)
- Author: "joe" <chevy1@jps.net>
- Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2000 12:59:36 -0700
- I won't touch that one!!! I will say that I have the Mustang II Crossmember from Fat Fendered Street Rods in my 50 and the Heidt's unit in my other project and their both the same. I wouldn't install
- /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00259.html (24,653 bytes)
- 29. Re: [oletrucks] IFS brand recommendation (score: 1)
- Author: "joe" <chevy1@jps.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 08:46:45 -0700
- That's correct Ryan I meant to say "WITHOUT"!!! My blower motor's weight is a little more weight then my second set of springs can handle so I'm also going to air ride in two months. Have you had the
- /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00340.html (28,079 bytes)
- 30. Re: [oletrucks] IFS brand recommendation (score: 1)
- Author: "joe" <chevy1@jps.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 09:44:41 -0700
- The problem that I've had the displeasure of see is frame twist and the need for rack time to put everything back into alignment. The side supports I'm talking about is nothing difficult it's just a
- /html/oletrucks/2000-09/msg00344.html (15,308 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu