Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+134\s+and\s+r12\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[oletrucks\]\s+134\s+and\s+r12\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [oletrucks] 134 and r12 (score: 1): Author: ke6bnl@juno.com; Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:46:46 -0800; I just bookmarked this site, they claim to be a bettert supstitute to r12 the 134 but I just herdo if it maybe someone is more familliar with it. http://www.cooltop.net/info.html I believe an 134 sub; /html/oletrucks/2003-03/msg00496.html (7,295 bytes)
2. Re: [oletrucks] 134 and r12 (score: 1): Author: Joe Garcia <joegarcia1@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 07:00:06 -0800; I'm running 134a in my 50 1/2 ton "Vintage Air". I've heard all the stores about.........."it won't cool as good as the R12". Well, I had my niece in the cab while I was charging up the system and sh; /html/oletrucks/2003-03/msg00522.html (8,378 bytes)
3. Re: [oletrucks] 134 and r12 (score: 1): Author: "jon peters" <i51gmc@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:47:08 -0500; r12 is the old r134a is the new and the other is a hybrid or mix of r12 and another component. the "its not as cold" quote comes from the volume.... you need more 134a and work it more to get the sa; /html/oletrucks/2003-03/msg00568.html (9,692 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]