Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:raknotts@qwest.net: 593 ]

Total 593 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 10:55:59 -0700
Thanks. The reason I was asking is I was wondering if it would be feasible to put a GMC 401 V-6 in a 1951- GMC pick up. I think the V-6's weighed 800-900 lbs. Bob K oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00659.html (9,840 bytes)

182. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:20:55 -0700
I'll probably stick with a 292 six. I'd rather go with a strictly GMC engine, but it seems the 302's are going out of sight. Bob K oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00662.html (10,940 bytes)

183. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:09:21 -0700
Need more than a 3/4 ton pick up to carry it!! Bob -- Original Message -- From: "Hanlon, Bill (ISS Houston)" <bill.hanlon@hp.com> To: "Devin Ranger" <devin_ranger@yahoo.com>; "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@q
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00668.html (13,646 bytes)

184. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 14:10:30 -0700
That's a thought. But I understand the 302 head "breathes" a lot better. Bob -- Original Message -- From: "Steve Hanberg" <steve@oldsub.com> To: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; "oletrucks" <oletru
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00669.html (12,984 bytes)

185. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 15:22:54 -0700
GGGRRREEEAAATTTT!! Bob no That of 1959 oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00674.html (13,090 bytes)

186. Re: [oletrucks] Engine Weights (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 15:24:34 -0700
I'd like a mix of a little more power, plus stay away from the modern (more common) V-8's. Bob K anyway. Bob I my "oletrucks" That of 1959 oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 19
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00675.html (14,310 bytes)

187. Re: [oletrucks] Amphibious AD (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 18:04:29 -0700
I saw a special or article a while ago abt life and the vehicles in Cuba today, and how they have improvised to keep the 1950's cars running. And I think there was an article, or maybe letter to the
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00678.html (10,914 bytes)

188. Re: [oletrucks] Questions, Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 23:01:20 -0700
I saw a guy (in Colorado!!!) who put a FXXD 7.3 diesel in his Scout II. He said there were two problems 1. He had to move the firewall back several inches 2. Everytime he hit deep mud or snow the fro
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00689.html (9,941 bytes)

189. Re: [oletrucks] Fw: Response to your For Sale page! (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 23:04:42 -0700
I have to tell you, Mr. Hanberg--I've ALREADY alerted the Arizona Rangers (and Tom Mix!!) to be on the look out for you web-footed/handed sly creatures. Of course, here in PHX your webs dry up and fa
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00690.html (18,146 bytes)

190. Re: [oletrucks] Fw: Response to your For Sale page! (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 10:57:10 -0700
It was 119 in my front yard last week. In the shade But, as the people in Death Valley will tell you, it's a DRY HEAT! WOW! Makes me feel better already! Like, maybe it's only 117! But it usually get
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00697.html (20,397 bytes)

191. Re: [oletrucks] Questions, Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 12:04:02 -0700
In the mid 60's I knew a person who had a Perkins (Brit) 4 cyl diesel engine in a Jeep, which I believe was a factory option. It worked quite well, but was used to move small travel trailers around a
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00699.html (12,132 bytes)

192. [oletrucks] Fw: eng swaps.. (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 14:09:36 -0700
But therein lies the problem-the V8 is the easy, logical way to go. If you're going to spend thousands to restore a 50 year old (plus) truck, I think you owe yourself the option of doing something ex
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00700.html (9,058 bytes)

193. Re: [oletrucks] Backup lights (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 15:36:28 -0700
Kirk, this is reaching, but just before I retired from the "nav", I was in the maintenance department of an aeroplane (RA5C Vigilante) squadron. Our planes were supersonic, so the warning lights (rot
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00702.html (9,033 bytes)

194. Re: [oletrucks] Fw: eng swaps.. (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 18:06:28 -0700
I talked to a guy at an ATHS truck show in Brooks Oregon a couple of years ago. He had a 1957 GMC 370 LCF. He put a Cummins 5.9 L diesel in it. He got the engine for free (I think) from an old manure
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00707.html (12,078 bytes)

195. Re: [oletrucks] 56 / 3100 / 6-cyl hydramatic - trailer hitch (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 21:13:40 -0700
U-haul has a pretty good range of hitches. A frame mounted hitch is the way to go if you're going to EVER tow a heavy load. And there are different capacity hitches in the frame mounted type. I put o
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00709.html (8,987 bytes)

196. Re: [oletrucks] Fw: Response to your For Sale page! (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:02:07 -0700
Hey, it got down to abt 90-95 this morning. And my sister-in-law on the Oregon coast says she'll trade me 30 inches of rain (they get 120-130 inches a year) for 30 degrees of heat. HHHMMM. Let's see.
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00714.html (24,242 bytes)

197. Re: [oletrucks] where'd everybody go?????? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 19:20:45 -0700
I'd feel pretty lonely if it weren't for all the "Junk" email!! Bob K stay oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00728.html (9,867 bytes)

198. Re: [oletrucks] where'd everybody go?????? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 20:01:37 -0700
Abt 109 here earlier. Felt like you needed paddles to get anyplace. Our monsoon season-but still no rain in the "Valley of The Sun" . I think last year we got ALMOST 3 inches of rain. Normal is abt 7
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00729.html (9,659 bytes)

199. Re: [oletrucks] maple leaf (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 20:36:33 -0700
made oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00754.html (8,980 bytes)

200. Re: [oletrucks] maple leaf (score: 1)
Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:24:47 -0700
Could you get a couple of photos of the truck in the bush, or is it covered? Any chance of some day getting a couple of photos of the GMC logo on the building? Does GM still own it? Thanks, Bob 1/2 s
/html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00757.html (10,471 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu