Mail Archive Search: <+from:raknotts@qwest.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:raknotts@qwest.net: 593 ]

Total 593 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [oletrucks] Re: Follow-up on 2004R Trans swap (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:34:04 -0700; Read your article. Interesting. Have you ever seen any estimates as to how many lbs of torque the 200 R4 would handle with just a mild build? Might be interesting. Bob -- Original Message -- From: "C; /html/oletrucks/2003-09/msg00349.html (12,013 bytes)
102. Re: [oletrucks] Re: Follow-up on 2004R Trans swap (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:41:52 -0700; People interested in the 400 R4 vs. 200 R4 might be interested in this article; http://www.darklair.com/monte/200.vs.700.html The 200 R4 might be a good transmission for a 302 or 292 installation. Bo; /html/oletrucks/2003-09/msg00350.html (12,074 bytes)
103. Re: [oletrucks] Tranny popping out of gear (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 17:09:33 -0700; I had the same problem years ago with a 50 Chevy car. I was told just that the gears were worn, and would have to be inspected and replaced as needed. I traded it off for a really neat 55 Merc. Bob K; /html/oletrucks/2003-09/msg00364.html (7,853 bytes)
104. Re: [oletrucks] wreck yard-another one (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 20:39:20 -0700; It's my understanding that the GMC 302 was a truck engine, period. But I've seen several pick ups , Chevy and GMC, with 302's. And I've seen modern rebuild parts for the 302. Bob K in PHX, AZ. look i; /html/oletrucks/2003-08/msg00032.html (8,715 bytes)
105. Re: [oletrucks] S-10 Donor Chassis (which model is the most (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:28:52 -0700; Are car frames heat treated? I remember the factory manual on my IH Travellal covered up to 5 ton trucks, and they were very concerned abt anyone welding or even drilling holes in the frames. Bob K i; /html/oletrucks/2003-08/msg00069.html (12,237 bytes)
106. Re: [oletrucks] S-10 Donor Chassis (which model is the most (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:41:54 -0700; IH was probably being super conservative. Bob K Where one correct correct can booster fine with worked, me Cab? chevy oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2003-08/msg00072.html (14,121 bytes)
107. Re: [oletrucks] engine (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:00:21 -0700; I'd rethink the fuel injection bit. More efficient, more responsive, starts easier,etc. I'd check around. Maybe someone on the list could help you with information, experiences. I suspect the cheapes; /html/oletrucks/2003-08/msg00363.html (8,944 bytes)
108. Re: [oletrucks] Inliners Convention (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:19:09 -0700; Tom, will you contact me off list? I've tried to email you direct, but the emails "bounce". Bob K %#@* it! won't oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2003-08/msg00364.html (8,490 bytes)
109. Re: [oletrucks] GMC 302 ??? (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 21:59:44 -0700; Try this website. http://www.chevytrucks.org/tech/gmc302.htm Bob K in PHX, oletrucks is devoted to Chevy and GM trucks built between 1941 and 1959; /html/oletrucks/2003-08/msg00437.html (7,422 bytes)
110. Re: [oletrucks] GMC 302 ??? (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2003 22:02:03 -0700; I just sent you an address of someone who put a bus 302 into their pick up. I think there's also one on military 302's. That one I don't have. BK -- Original Message -- From: <rnwagner@juno.com> To:; /html/oletrucks/2003-08/msg00438.html (7,426 bytes)
111. Re: [oletrucks] Truck Moving (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 05:21:14 -0700; I'm shocked! We have to furnish our own rope?!. Now, in Arizona, we're more civilized; WE will furnish the 3/4 inch hemp-albut well broken in from dozens of previous uses. So come ahead; keep Arizona; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00000.html (9,686 bytes)
112. Re: [oletrucks] Problem with Chevy Duty (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 10:14:01 -0700; Sounds like a VERY unsatisfactory response. You pay your money, you have a right to expect ALL the parts, unless they specify in their add that commonly available misc. hardware is not included. Many; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00012.html (13,626 bytes)
113. Re: [oletrucks] Re: [old-chevy-truck] Problem with Chevy Duty (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 10:26:11 -0700; Do the instructions tell you you will need to obtain the small parts separately? Do your adds mention that a few commonly available parts will need to be purchased locally? I think it might have been; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00013.html (13,642 bytes)
114. Re: [oletrucks] Problem with Chevy Duty (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 18:57:50 -0700; Sounds like fraud to me. I wonder if the Federal Communications Com. would handle that? Or maybe your state attorney general. Bob K in PHX, AZ. -- Original Message -- From: "Antonio R. Tijerino" <ant; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00017.html (10,316 bytes)
115. Re: [oletrucks] Problem with Chevy Duty (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2003 06:30:37 -0700; In the military, we had a saying "One AWE S--T cancels 1000 atta boys". Goes along with "The bad is remembered forever, the good is fleeting ". Pretty well true in civilian life too. A vendor may thi; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00026.html (16,758 bytes)
116. Re: [oletrucks] Problem with Chevy Duty (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 08:52:02 -0700; I promised myself I wouldn't say anything more on this subject. I lied. lessons learned ; 1.Different people have different backgrounds and mechanical abilities. 2. Nothing is perfect. 3. It is a rea; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00061.html (29,599 bytes)
117. Re: [oletrucks] Problem with Chevy Duty (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:57:16 -0700; I've spent abt 42 years in some kind of customer service, and while sometimes it's almost impossible to satisfy people, when you see or hear that light bulb go on over their head, all the aggravation; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00077.html (22,825 bytes)
118. Re: [oletrucks] Problem with Chevy Duty (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2003 14:24:18 -0700; I think the problem with ChevyDuty--IS OVER!! BK to do of has too and need know IS or then person, In be a important even but I generally for clear my help instructions determine how that touch more; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00110.html (34,195 bytes)
119. Re: [oletrucks] Intro (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 10:25:34 -0700; Russ, I'm going to the Brothers truck show on the 20th in Anaheim (unless I break something new!!). If there are any 41's there, I'd be happy to shoot photos of anything you're interested in. I'm a r; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00154.html (10,477 bytes)
120. Re: [oletrucks] Intro (score: 1): Author: "Bob KNOTTS" <raknotts@qwest.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 13:57:36 -0700; Were there any 1942, 46, or 47 Chevy / GMC pick ups? Were they the pre-war style, or the same as the 47-55 style? Thanks, Bob K in PHX, AZ enjoyed all the information that has been passed around. see; /html/oletrucks/2003-07/msg00155.html (9,856 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 120
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]