Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*U\.S\.\s+postage\s+stamps\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*U\.S\.\s+postage\s+stamps\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: U.S. postage stamps (score: 1): Author: Janet Berry <jberry@comp.uark.edu>; Date: Tue, 3 Sep 1996 08:44:35 -0500 (CDT); You guys that are using .55 to mail a newsletter should look at bulk mail. It does cost $75 a year for a permit, and you do have to mail it from the same post office (in fact it is $75 extra to move; /html/newsletters/1996-09/msg00000.html (6,928 bytes)
2. Re: U.S. postage stamps (score: 1): Author: Doug Auburg <dauburg@worldaccess.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Sep 1996 19:43:08 -0700; I agree, though I have a few thoughts to add. The old Post Office Dept. is apparently working to make things less convenient for us "little mailers". Rates have just gone up for mailings where you do; /html/newsletters/1996-09/msg00002.html (8,737 bytes)
3. U.S. postage stamps (score: 1): Author: TATERRY@aol.com; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 11:55:34 -0400; This list is either dormant or else I'm not on it anymore....so lets try sending a message: If any of you use the 100 roll stamps like me and the little machine for applying them be advised that our; /html/newsletters/1996-08/msg00002.html (7,222 bytes)
4. Re: U.S. postage stamps (score: 1): Author: Bob Lang <LANG@ISIS.MIT.EDU>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 12:16:43 -0500 (EST); When I do "stamping", I usually buy the self-adhesive type if the mailing is less than 6 8 X 11 pages. When its bigger, I wind up getting sheets of 50 or 100 $.55's and rippin' them apart and the us; /html/newsletters/1996-08/msg00003.html (7,904 bytes)
5. Re: U.S. postage stamps (score: 1): Author: Janet Berry <jberry@comp.uark.edu>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 12:00:21 -0500 (CDT); One of the best features of bulk mail is that you put the bulk mail notation on the items before it is printed, you give the post office money, and they mail it. Is the imprint available for regular; /html/newsletters/1996-08/msg00004.html (7,108 bytes)
6. Re: U.S. postage stamps (score: 1): Author: "Lindberg, Andrew (MN12)" <Andrew.Lindberg@CORP.honeywell.com>; Date: 30 Aug 1996 12:17:56 -0500; "I'd like to see rolls of $.55's that are self-adhesive." The packets of 20 self-adhesives 55-centers work fine for me. Andy Lindberg (Triumphs & Tribulations); /html/newsletters/1996-08/msg00005.html (6,951 bytes)
7. Re: U.S. postage stamps (score: 1): Author: Bob Lang <LANG@ISIS.MIT.EDU>; Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 13:31:38 -0500 (EST); You need to have a "big-ish" list for bulk to work, some folks say over 200 for it to be cost-effective. You can pull a "first class permit" for a filing fee, I think its $75 a year at your local pos; /html/newsletters/1996-08/msg00006.html (8,273 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]