Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*aol\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*aol\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. AOL (score: 1): Author: Sheree.Wegeng@carle.com; Date: Wednesday, 11 December 1996 11:24am CT; Well, I guess this has effectively ended this list, because the only people who had anything interesting or informative to say were mostly the AOL people. They can't send mail to the list, and none o; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg01043.html (7,201 bytes)
2. Re: AOL (score: 1): Author: Len Bugel <bugel@bianca.sms.k12.vt.us>; Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 14:43:55 -0600 (CST); We should ALL, aol and non-aol alike, grow up! Mark has done a hell of a job, and made fine resources available to us, at no charge, for a long time. Let's play by his rules - it's his ball! Len Buge; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg01050.html (6,960 bytes)
3. Re: AOL (score: 1): Author: Jeremy DuBois <jer@thlogic.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 15:30:19 -0500 (EST); A lot of us did donate quite a bit of money to keep the lists afloat a while back. What ever happened to that, did he ever go buy a new server? -- Jeremy DuBois jer@thlogic.com Manager, Info Systems; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg01063.html (7,261 bytes)
4. Re: AOL (score: 1): Author: "W. R. Gibbons" <gibbons@northpole.med.uvm.edu>; Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 17:31:25 -0500 (EST); AMEN. But then, of course, I don't have an AOL address. Still, Mark does this as a volunteer, and I really appreciate it. If AOL causes him an unreasonable amount of work, what choices does he have?; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg01083.html (7,552 bytes)
5. AOL (score: 1): Author: "David Littlefield" <dmeadow@flash.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Dec 1996 18:37:04 -0600; Here, here! Whatta buncha cry-babies. If getting the list in digest form versus the regular way is enough to cause you to pick up your toys out of the sandbox and go home, then who is the immature on; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg01100.html (7,635 bytes)
6. AOL (score: 1): Author: "Kai Radicke" <mowogmg@dynanet.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 09:19:36 -0500; Stop this thread now, I don't care and many other people don't care about what you think about Mark and his decision. Mark, had his reasons, and that should be enough. My reasons are as follows: AOL; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg01224.html (7,389 bytes)
7. aol (score: 1): Author: CMaster808@aol.com; Date: Sat, 14 Dec 1996 09:47:50 -0500; --PART.BOUNDARY.0.24663.emout10.mail.aol.com.850574868 Content-ID: <0_24663_850574868@emout10.mail.aol.com.13448> Content-type: text/plain attach --PART.BOUNDARY.0.24663.emout10.mail.aol.com.85057486; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg01225.html (8,207 bytes)
8. Re: AOL (score: 1): Author: Paul Hunt <on76@dial.pipex.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 96 18:25:12 GMT; When you 're-visit' a page it can be loaded from the cache on your disk or from the network. It is a configuration option on Mosaic and Netscape, at least, I received Compuserve/Mosaic configured to; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg01327.html (7,447 bytes)
9. Re: AOL (score: 1): Author: Aleksandr Milewski <n6mod@amt.org>; Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 11:20:55 -0800; It's worse than that. AOL caches at the network level, so even if you purge the caches on your browser, the AOL proxy server will still feed you an outdated copy. I could see that on database searche; /html/mgs/1996-12/msg01330.html (7,732 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]