Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Why\s+No\s+MGs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Why\s+No\s+MGs\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Why No MGs (score: 1): Author: "mghirsch" <mghirsch@netzero.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:53:04 -0500; I remember reading somewhere it has to do with the way they pulled out of the market here. Apparently there could be legal problems with the old franchisees (dealers) if they brought the cars here. M; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00509.html (6,426 bytes)
2. Re: Why No MGs (score: 1): Author: "David Breneman" <idcb@airborne.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:26:16 -0700 (PDT); mghirsch SEZ - It was British Leyland that stabbed the dealers (and MG) in the back. That company is long gone. (Well, Leyland Trucks still exists - owned by PACCAR here in the US!) MG has changed ha; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00519.html (7,067 bytes)
3. RE: Why No MGs (score: 1): Author: "Lew Palmer" <lpalmer@roundaboutmanor.com>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 19:35:05 -0500; One other thing: I brought up all of the issues: unfulfilled contracts, legal issues, you name it. I was told point blank by the Deputy Director of MG Rover that none of those issues were of concern; /html/mgs/2003-09/msg00547.html (7,118 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]