Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SCCA\s+autox\s+rules\s+\-\-\s+just\s+curious\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*SCCA\s+autox\s+rules\s+\-\-\s+just\s+curious\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. SCCA autox rules -- just curious (score: 1): Author: "Dan Ray" <danray@bluegrass.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 18:53:13 -0600; This has been bugging me since attending the Louisville BCC meeting. Keith Wheeler, are you listening? We had an SCCA rep give a talk on Autocrossing, a good talk, but sorta not that crowd's "bag". I; /html/mgs/1998-03/msg01845.html (7,433 bytes)
2. Re: SCCA autox rules -- just curious (score: 1): Author: Susan and John Roper <vscjohn@iamerica.net>; Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 18:10:20 -0600; Dan, the point of the no leaks rule is to avoid dropping fluids on course that will effect other cars. Not intended to preclude the underside rust prevention program standard on most of our toys. May; /html/mgs/1998-03/msg01855.html (7,979 bytes)
3. Re: SCCA autox rules -- just curious (score: 1): Author: Barney Gaylord <barneymg@ntsource.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 18:40:57; Tech Inspection rules he listed was..."NO LEAKS". In addition to the nothing loose" rule, this brought a chuckle from the august body of LBC owners... How stringent is the "no leaks" inspection rule?; /html/mgs/1998-03/msg01870.html (8,461 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]