- 1. Re: New MG Sports Car (score: 1)
- Author: WSpohn4@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:47:05 EDT
- These arguments never seem to convince anyone on either side of the validity of the logic offered by the other side, and they go on, and on, and..... Perhaps we could agree that when there has been a
- /html/mgs/2002-10/msg00599.html (7,719 bytes)
- 2. RE: New MG Sports Car (score: 1)
- Author: "Lew Palmer" <lpalmer@roundaboutmanor.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:32:44 -0500
- The point I was originally trying to make (tongue-in-cheek, by the way) was that there have been several changes in ownership, management, factory location, designers, etc. over the years. Nearly eve
- /html/mgs/2002-10/msg00601.html (9,196 bytes)
- 3. Re: New MG Sports Car (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 11:44:54 -0500
- By that logic, the latest you could clain a real MG would be before Leyland did their leveraged buyout of BMC. Actually, before that with other mergers. I was looking for Skye's British Car family tr
- /html/mgs/2002-10/msg00604.html (8,370 bytes)
- 4. Re: New MG Sports Car (score: 1)
- Author: WSpohn4@aol.com
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 13:11:17 EDT
- That's the difficulty with MG - you have to accept the various mergers - no reason not to, as there was continuity of personnel and usually even of manufacturing sites - but at what point (when they
- /html/mgs/2002-10/msg00605.html (8,568 bytes)
- 5. Re: New MG Sports Car (score: 1)
- Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.cx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 17:00:11 -0700
- *de-lurk* http://www.mgbexperience.com/reference/evolution.html Skye /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
- /html/mgs/2002-10/msg00644.html (7,116 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu