Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*More\s+Re\:\s+Why\s+Unibody\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*More\s+Re\:\s+Why\s+Unibody\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. More Re: Why Unibody (score: 1): Author: KGROWLER@aol.com; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 13:43:22 EST; Relevant to the discussion of the monocoque MGs is the following from an article in "MGB Driver" last summer written by Peter Thornley in remembrance of his father John Thornley, the General Manager; /html/mgs/1999-12/msg01045.html (8,570 bytes)
2. Re: More Re: Why Unibody (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 12:40:38 -0800; KGROWLER@aol.com had this to say: a ...which explains why the body style didn't change a jot in 18 years. In retrospect, we might very well have had an MGB replacement in say, 1972, had BMC not been; /html/mgs/1999-12/msg01052.html (7,708 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]