- 1. Heater valve & ole #4 (was: Re: The old hotfoot routine) (score: 1)
- Author: "Jason F. Dutt" <simjason@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 15:13:25 -0400
- just material your My mistake. This makes more sense. I guess I forgot physics 101 for a minute. :-) Really? Any comments from the peanut gallery?
- /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01617.html (8,336 bytes)
- 2. Re: Heater valve & ole #4 (was: Re: The old hotfoot routine) (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Schooler <schooler@erols.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 14:36:15 -0400
- (Oh, what the heck - I'll chime in with flame bait.) I've seen this nonsense comment before and don't believe it in the least. Remember that this car was often produced without a heater at all. In ma
- /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01801.html (9,588 bytes)
- 3. Re: Heater valve & ole #4 (was: Re: The old hotfoot routine) (score: 1)
- Author: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 21:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
- I read this in Stapleton's book "How to make your Sprite outperform a 2liter twincam crossflow MGB", or some such title. He said that if you are removing the heater, replace it by a hose rather than
- /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01839.html (8,935 bytes)
- 4. Re: Heater valve & ole #4 (was: Re: The old hotfoot routine) (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Schooler <schooler@erols.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 07:29:32 -0400
- Thought has crossed my mind that we're working under an assumption here that water flow is the same in a Sprite as in an MGB. Confirmation, anyone? I'm talking MGB, Ulix is talking Sprite - are we on
- /html/mgs/1997-07/msg01854.html (9,593 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu