Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Clutch\s+and\s+camber\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Clutch\s+and\s+camber\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Clutch and camber (score: 1): Author: "Martin C. Galan" <batangelias@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 05:00:04 -0700 (PDT); Hello Listers, I finally have my 65 roadster on the road. Thank you to all that gave their advice while I was putting the MGB together. I hope to post a few pictures on the web soon. On the drive ho; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00347.html (7,732 bytes)
2. Re: Clutch and camber (score: 1): Author: "Telewest $PH$" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 15:41:25 +0100; Hmmm, firstly MGBs have no adjustment to the clutch, and clutch wear is usually signified by engagement/disengagement near the floor. I suppose you could introduce some 'wear' by filing the clutch pe; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00352.html (8,356 bytes)
3. Re: Clutch and camber (score: 1): Author: "Dean T. Lake" <dtlake@erols.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:16:31 -0400; For some of us, we wouldn't have it any other way! Moderate oversteer is the goal of every modification I've ever made to my B's suspension - consider yourself ready to enjoy driving the way we were; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00355.html (6,941 bytes)
4. Re: Clutch and camber (score: 1): Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>; Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 03:23:06 +1030; Would you prefer understeer/push? Some people suggest that this is what cars should do but I would rather the arse swinging out a little rather than turning the wheel and still going straight - espec; /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00379.html (8,273 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]