- 1. Re: Another beginner question...... (score: 1)
- Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>
- Date: Mon, 03 May 2004 13:36:59 -0600
- Brian and others afflicted with the missing hood prop attachment point, I have successfully attached my hood prop in what I think is a close approximation of the original configuration. Only a very k
- /html/mgs/2004-05/msg00036.html (8,374 bytes)
- 2. Another beginner question...... (score: 1)
- Author: "Brian Lundgren" <elco506@austin.rr.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:03:23 -0500
- I've just joined this group, recently getting back into MGB ownerhood! The response is great and I appreciate all the help! The PO of my '75 B used a piece of wood for hood prop. I purchased a new re
- /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00583.html (7,251 bytes)
- 3. Re: Another beginner question...... (score: 1)
- Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:54:20 -0600
- I have been pondering the same dilemma. I presume the setup is similar to my 72B. I have all the parts but no attachment point on the body for the hood prop (telescopic type). Listers have indicated
- /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00584.html (8,906 bytes)
- 4. Re: Another beginner question...... (score: 1)
- Author: "MonteMorris" <mmorris@nemr.net>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:49:49 -0500
- I found that the original prop and bracket work better than the newer telescopic/hydrolic ones. I installed both and didn't like the way they supported the lids so I removed them after a few days (an
- /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00592.html (9,769 bytes)
- 5. RE: Another beginner question...... (score: 1)
- Author: "James Nazarian" <jhn3@uakron.edu>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:14:59 -0400
- As far as the "in" goes, it is flush or just slightly proud of the fender James Nazarian 71 MGBGT V8 71 MGB Tourer I have been pondering the same dilemma. I presume the setup is similar to my 72B. I
- /html/mgs/2004-04/msg00595.html (8,575 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu