- 1. Fuel Tank (score: 1)
- Author: "Bruce" <brucemills@dccnet.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 13:34:44 -0700
- It is hard to believe in 2 -3 months my 75 MGB will be off the road under going the installation of the Rover 3.5lt engine which I have spent all fall, winter and spring working on. There was a posti
- /html/mgb-v8/2000-07/msg00042.html (7,408 bytes)
- 2. Re: Fuel Tank (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Stuart <jimbb88@erols.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 18:58:03 -0400
- I just removed the tank, cut a new hole for the filler, put it back in the new location with a floor jack to hold it in place, drilled new holes from underneath. You will use the same captive nuts on
- /html/mgb-v8/2000-07/msg00043.html (8,324 bytes)
- 3. Re: Fuel Tank (score: 1)
- Author: Larry Dickstein <bugide@tfs.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 20:12:54 -0500
- That's the way I did it as well. If I remember correctly (and that's a reach these days) I used a late model Midget rubber tube to make it from the stock filler neck to the tank. -- Larry Dickstein L
- /html/mgb-v8/2000-07/msg00045.html (8,964 bytes)
- 4. Re: Fuel Tank (score: 1)
- Author: Jim Stuart <jimbb88@erols.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 21:43:04 -0400
- I used a tank to filler hose from a Jag XJ6, from the local LBC shop junk bin. Do not, under any circumstances, use a radiator hose. Jim
- /html/mgb-v8/2000-07/msg00046.html (9,568 bytes)
- 5. RE: Fuel Tank (score: 1)
- Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 22:22:28 -0600
- Do not, Hmm, never thought about radiator hose vs. fuel filler hose. Different composition? Larry Hoy
- /html/mgb-v8/2000-07/msg00049.html (7,492 bytes)
- 6. RE: Fuel Tank (score: 1)
- Author: Paul.Kile@Aerojet.com (KILE, PAUL D)
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 06:20:26 -0700
- That's funny - I ordered a fuel filler hose for my GT V-8 from Moss and they sent me a hunk of Gates Green Stripe (Industrial quality straight radiator hose). I wonder how long it will hold up? Maybe
- /html/mgb-v8/2000-07/msg00060.html (7,788 bytes)
- 7. fuel tank (score: 1)
- Author: "packrat6" <packrat6@charter.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:25:47 -0400
- anyone know if there is any difference in moss's $349 mgb fuel tank and the $149 ones on ebay? look to be pretty much the same.????? /// /// mgb-v8@autox.team.net mailing list ///
- /html/mgb-v8/2007-07/msg00027.html (6,480 bytes)
- 8. Re: fuel tank (score: 1)
- Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 16:39:48 +0100
- Bear in mind you get what you pay for, even if they are supposed to be the correct item for your year. Some repro parts barely fit properly, let alone work properly. "Pretty much" may be no-where nea
- /html/mgb-v8/2007-07/msg00028.html (6,856 bytes)
- 9. RE: fuel tank (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Stuart" <jimbb88@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:31:52 -0400
- At least some of the E-bay tanks are made of a corrosion resistant alloy. Check, some are not. Jim Stuart Reply to <jimbb88@comcast.net> anyone know if there is any difference in moss's $349 mgb fuel
- /html/mgb-v8/2007-07/msg00029.html (6,969 bytes)
- 10. RE: fuel tank (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Stuart" <jimbb88@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:36:36 -0400
- SOMETIMES you get what you pay for, certainly not always, and certainly not always in the British car hobby. Many sellers have poorly fitting high priced items in their catalog, so price alone is not
- /html/mgb-v8/2007-07/msg00030.html (7,039 bytes)
- 11. RE: fuel tank (score: 1)
- Author: "Dodd, Kelvin" <doddk@mossmotors.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 12:07:10 -0700
- The more expensive Moss one is made by British Motor Heritage in the UK. The cheaper ones aren't. That is not to say that the cheaper ones aren't good value for money. But that is why the difference
- /html/mgb-v8/2007-07/msg00032.html (7,118 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu