Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Aluminium\s+radiators\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Aluminium\s+radiators\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Aluminium radiators (score: 1): Author: Barrie Robinson <barrie@look.ca>; Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:57:03 -0700; While reeling in ecstasy because my MGB GT V8 just flew down to the BIG car show I still have this nagging ":the engine bay could be cooler when going slow" thought. While at the show I spoke to Keit; /html/mgb-v8/2005-09/msg00035.html (8,525 bytes)
2. Re: Aluminium radiators (score: 1): Author: "Carl Floyd" <cmfloyd@chartertn.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 12:34:49 -0400; Maybe the aluminum rad had much more capacity. My money is on the mechanical fan. Most electric fans cannot do what a mechanically driven fan can do, airflow-wise. I, also, use a mechanical fan (& a; /html/mgb-v8/2005-09/msg00036.html (10,012 bytes)
3. Re: Aluminium radiators (score: 1): Author: "Paul Hunt" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>; Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:04:09 +0100; Modern ali radiators are usually left shiny. I think they are a matter of greatly reduced cost - as long as they can get one of the required size in - rather than greater efficiency. It is a factor o; /html/mgb-v8/2005-09/msg00037.html (9,220 bytes)
4. Re: Aluminium radiators (score: 1): Author: James Jewell <m1garand@speakeasy.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:58:05 -0400; Here's the scoop: Aluminum is less conductive than brass and copper, however, the fins in copper radiators have to be soldered/brazed to the copper tubes. The lead-based braze is FAR less conductive; /html/mgb-v8/2005-09/msg00038.html (10,762 bytes)
5. Re: Aluminium radiators (score: 1): Author: James Jewell <m1garand@speakeasy.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:34:54 -0400; absotively posolutely!! Lead is a wonderful insulator... What a wealth of pedantic info today!!! Your sure about this and didn't just rationalize it that way right? --Original Message-- From: owner-m; /html/mgb-v8/2005-09/msg00039.html (11,468 bytes)
6. Re: Aluminium radiators (score: 1): Author: DANMAS@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 17:58:11 EDT; Here's the scoop: Aluminum is less conductive than brass and copper, however, the fins in copper radiators have to be soldered/brazed to the copper tubes. The lead-based braze is FAR less conductive; /html/mgb-v8/2005-09/msg00040.html (9,489 bytes)
7. RE: Aluminium radiators (score: 1): Author: "James Nazarian" <jhn3@uakron.edu>; Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 18:52:34 -0400; I don't mean to sound confrontational but in the interest of preventing the spread of mis-information... A couple of basic truths: Aluminum has roughly twice the convective heat transfer coefficient; /html/mgb-v8/2005-09/msg00042.html (10,188 bytes)
8. Re: Aluminium radiators (score: 1): Author: Simon & Donna <sdaustin@shaw.ca>; Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:55:47 -0700; I had a custom rad made up for my project (not aluminum, mostly due to cost). Stock width but 20" tall, 4-core. 2300 miles running with no problems using two original RB electric fans with a thermo s; /html/mgb-v8/2005-09/msg00043.html (8,808 bytes)
9. RE: Aluminium radiators (score: 1): Author: "James Nazarian" <jhn3@uakron.edu>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 18:49:28 -0400; James, I certainly wasn't singling you out, just want to be clear on that. Those numbers were just some average coefficients for stock materials that I grabbed real quick. The numbers themselves aren; /html/mgb-v8/2005-09/msg00046.html (10,165 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]