- 1. RE: Traction control III (score: 1)
- Author: "Smith, Bill" <Bill.Smith@sandycorp.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 21:40:30 -0500
- Tom How would you define a traction control device? -
- /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00418.html (6,693 bytes)
- 2. Re: Traction control III (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 08:19:57 -0800
- Anything that limits wheel spin would be considered traction control. That has to include limited slip rear ends and locked differentials or spools , which are not considered illegal. I think what we
- /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00428.html (7,211 bytes)
- 3. Re: Traction control III (score: 1)
- Author: Nt788@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:41:16 EST
- I think so too! And we will go faster too! Jack
- /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00433.html (6,874 bytes)
- 4. Re: Traction control III (score: 1)
- Author: "todd" <todd@twinjugs.com>
- Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:51:03 -0500
- Very rational thoughts Tom. And if someone doesn't like the rules as written, there are proper procedures in place to submit a request for deviations under the NOTICE in the front of the book as well
- /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00434.html (7,823 bytes)
- 5. Re: Traction control III (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 10:50:54 -0700
- ok good, since I put a few hrs into mounting a worm gear style speedometer drive to my rear wheel, like I have on the front wheel, then I routed them so that the arm from wheel front drive trips a co
- /html/land-speed/2003-12/msg00476.html (7,852 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu